Apocalypse isnt in the books anymore and Mystique has barely been used this generation. Magneto is an actual bonafide X-man and has been for nearly 13 years straight. Sinister has played a big part in giving Kwannon some much needed development
Eh. Apocalypse had a meaty role in his limited time in this era. Which is more I can say to the X-Men like Rogue, Iceman, Marvel Girl and Jubilee. I read at least first 17 issues of Marauders, eXcalibur, X-Force before I stopped reading them in May or April. X of Swords was basically an Apocalypse centric event. Will Iceman get a centric event like that?
Magneto will always be first and foremost as a X-villain. When people think of X-Men #1 enemy, they think of Magneto. Its just a matter of time, when another writer reverts his role back to a villain. And if not, he's just going to appear like the head honcho neXt to the Professor.
The development that they are giving to Sinister could have been given to underused X-Man or X-Woman. The big 3 villains of the X-Men basically got a more substantial role than Bishop, Kwannon, Psylocke, Iceman, and I would say even Cyclops. Those villains are appearing as the leads/more superior while the non villainous mutants are getting supporting roles.
And Mystique... she's going to be a villain in the fall? I don't know why would they couldn't give that role to someone else who haven't been part of anything for years or couldn't they introduce someone new.
This era IMO has been more productive for the villains (former or not) compare to the non villanious mutants.
As for Kwannon, I've said this before. I don't like she's using the codename Psylocke rather than her original codename in the 90s. Its also confusing even to a comic reader like me. She's basically a Psylocke 2.0 now and you know how I feel about legacy characters.
Also speaking of non villainous mutants. Moira has been mostly unpresent since Power/House of X ended. Its like Hickman forgot her.