Search results for query: *

It'll probably have them and it doesn't bother me but it would be a nice touch to avoid them entirely in the DCU.

I am so fascinated by how defensive people are of Coppola and cherry picking details from that Guardian article. Mostly ignoring the sexual misconduct lol.

The ref was absolutely right to step in when he did. Fury's refusal to go down was beyond impressive but standing and eating Usyk's ****ing Final Fantasy limit break is the type of **** that shaves years off your life.

What an incredible fight. Usyk rocking Fury and hunting him around the ring as he stumbled was heart-stopping.

I never want or need to see young Peter Parker stories again but Ditko era Spidey is my favourite so that's Something!

Why do people think an article about Gollum would talk about Batman? It’s of zero relevance to the articles subject matter that Serkis is in another movie in a similar time frame (possibly very briefly if it’s a similar role to the first movie).

Even if Joker doesn't cross a billion there is a 0% chance it isn't the highest grossing movie DC puts out for the foreseeable future. It's the only one that might do a billion and will at the very least push it.

To be fair, The Penguin actually gives them a vested interest to not deflate hype surrounding it by Reeves publicly dropping out and the movie its designed to set up being iced. I don't think that's going to happen, for the record.

I'm pretty cynical about what's going on BTS at DC but Supergirl and The Batman, Part II both have equal amounts of information that has been dropped about them. Supergirl's was just more recent and Gunn is a cloying hypeman in a way Reeves is not.

Could it not be just that it's multiple years away? It is gonna be wild if they ice an existent, successful franchise in favour of a purely hypothetical one that has zero proof of success.

The DCEU had a moment where it probably could have righted the ship around Wonder Woman and Aquaman. It just completely failed to do so as a result of poor decision making as well as external factors, even though I like a bunch of the movies that didn't do very well like BoP and TSS.

I am so deeply confused by Andy Serkis being in the exact same scheduling situation he was during the first movie is causing the latest bout of insane The Batman, Part II paranoia. "Paranoid" really is the first word that comes to mind when I think of this fandom now (I am also totally guilty of...

I'm not talking about Superman as a character overall, I'm talking about the difference between a popular show and a movie series virtually no one in the GA remembers beyond it being a byword for terrible comic book movies. Cavill was barely present in the role for that decade.

It absolutely isn't, any GA member who likes fantasy stuff probably watched The Witcher. It's not like the biggest hit in the world but it was a very popular show and, let me put it this way, people being sad about Cavill not being Geralt anymore is a common refrain I hear IRL (subjective...

I'm not sure Cavill got all that much love and fame for the role, tbh. At least in my subjective experience Cavill is 100% Geralt in people's minds. That is his big role that people love him in, his Superman is only really popular in very specific CBM circles.

This made me tear up. NGL.

Nah, it's not wrong. This looks and sounds like an elderly narcissist's vanity project that people are pretending looks amazing even though it has all the aesthetic appeal of a Neon tinted Netflix sci-fi show simply because it has a respectable name slapped on it.

Looks like a high class Neil Breen movie.

There is a world of difference between Guardians Vol. 3 and Superman in terms of fundamental public interest. Totally disparate situations.

Hugo Strange is a boring non-character apart from his delightfully freaky portrayal as a sick pervert in Prey. I've always felt people were only excited by the prospect of him because he's one of the last notable names who hasn't been in a movie. That being said, I'd much prefer Strange to be in...