• Secure your account

    A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.

  • Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) There shouldn't be any downtime, as it's just a maintenance release. More info here

Iron Man #1 Top Selling Comic (October 2015)

I personally don't care for it. You can easily swap creators around and have logical stopping and starting points with regular numbering. In today's age where people can look up back material through digital shops and TPBs there really is no excuse to be intimidated by a higher number. People aren't intimidated by the higher numbers of the Walking Dead and DC's most stable titles are the ones approaching their 50th issues. If Marvel treated #1s the way DC and Archie did, then there would be no problem, but they abused it to the point where #1s don't mean anything anymore. Just stick with original numbering because people aren't falling for the numbering fashion that Marvel prefers.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"