MacLeod
Sidekick
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2005
- Messages
- 1,021
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Jesus, it's like talking to a wall.
MacLeod: "Five is an even number, which is bad, so I don't like five!"
Saint: "Actually, five is not an even number."
MacLeod: "Shut up, Saint! It's my opinion! You can't tell me my likes in dislikes are wrong!"
Saint: "I didn't say anything about your opinions: I only corrected your mistake. I don't care about your opinion, it has nothing to do with what I said."
MaLeod: "Shut up! It's opinion! And if you don't care about my opinion, why did you mention it? So there!"
Saint: "I mentioned it because you acted as if it was what I was talking about, which is not accurate. How could I tell you that your opinion is not what I'm talking about without mentioning it?"
Five is an odd number. The Tumbler was designed to have a bat-motif. Whether you dislike five, or think the motif is too subtle, or "wasn't done to the fullest" is irrelevant to any of comments. Allow me to refresh your memory.
You said the following:
The insinuation here i that Nolan--and his team--did not design the Tumbler to have a bat-motif. This is not opinion, because we know they did design the car with a bat-motif. Crowley--who designed the thing with Nolan in Nolan's garage--has said outright that it was designed with a bat-motif, and we have seen it demonstrated. As such, I posted to correct your mistake. Inexplicably, you decided this was an attack on your opinion. I don't care about your opinion. If you think the Tumbler is crap, that the bat-motif is a failure, or that it's too subtle, that's great. It does not, however, have anything to do with my original post, which is why I said it's irrelevant when you repeatedly brought it up.
If it was not your intention to say that Nolan and Crowley did not incorporate a bat-motif into the car, then I have misread your comment, and it's my mistake. If you do mean to say that, though, then you are mistaken, and your claim that it's a matter of opinion is also a mistake.
I agree, it is frustrating to talk to people when they just don't get it or jump to the wrong conclusion. The wall is talking back now. I hate to say it was your mistake but it was never my intention to say they didn't design it with a bat motif it's just that I don't see it clearly and don't like it. Your insinuation is that I am stating things that I dont' know anything about where in fact I do and just wanted to express my opinion of such material with those that wanted to read it. I don't feel it's necessary to say my opinion over and over again especically since my last post stated that it was designed to be a bat motif I just don't like it. By saying something in this thread means I know what I'm talking about in reference to information, as I thought we all do, so I just jump to what I see, feel, and think. By saying my statements I would hope that everyone already would know that a Batman fan knew the facts and just wanted to praise them or gripe about them. So, without beating an already dead horse yet again, technically all we are discussing here is my opinion of the car because I knew very clearly what Nolan and team were thinking and tried to do. By saying the third film should have a more bat-ified vehicle does represent my distaste for the previous vehicles eventhough I knew the intention of the film makers.