- Joined
- Dec 27, 2005
- Messages
- 193,457
- Reaction score
- 80,564
- Points
- 218
I mean..it would be a great name for a pair of trainers or sandals.What is it then? A brand of footwear?
I mean..it would be a great name for a pair of trainers or sandals.What is it then? A brand of footwear?
A state of mind.What is it then? A brand of footwear?
My thoughts exactly. And it fits with the titling of the films that wrap up the trilogy, which previously pointed to a Force user.I have a theory.
I think I read somewhere that in one of the recent books in the new canon, certain force sensitive individuals who can navigate through space are referred to as “skywalkers”, implying that it’s also a title and not just a name.
At the end of “The Last Jedi”, it is implied with “broom boy” the Force is available to all people throughout the galaxy, and not just to people of special bloodlines.
Going by the title of this film, “Skywalker” may refer to the rise of a new type of force sensitive individual, not Jedi or Sith, but a balancing of the two into a complete and whole force user, one with a new philosophy and practice of the Force.
Just my .02.
This is the end of the Skywalker saga so Skywalker definitely matters.Why does skywalker even matter anymore?
Yep, in total agreement. It was my first thought after seeing the title and it fits a lot of different ways.Thrawn Alliances established that the Chiss refer to their Force Sensitives by a term that, when translated into Basic means “Sky Walker”. I could see the end of this film making “Skywalker” a title that Rey takes up and perhaps the future Jedi refer to themselves as. I’d also think it’ll have a dual meaning ala Return of the Jedi, and partially refer to Kylo finding some kind of redemption.
Why?I just wish one of these films didn’t start with “The”.
Many (critics and fans) hated slapping the Solo surname on Han in the Solo movie and it's lame if they just doing that to everybody with Skywalker.
This is the end of the Skywalker saga so Skywalker definitely matters.
I have a theory.
I think I read somewhere that in one of the recent books in the new canon, certain force sensitive individuals who can navigate through space are referred to as “skywalkers”, implying that it’s also a title and not just a name.
At the end of “The Last Jedi”, it is implied with “broom boy” the Force is available to all people throughout the galaxy, and not just to people of special bloodlines.
Going by the title of this film, “Skywalker” may refer to the rise of a new type of force sensitive individual, not Jedi or Sith, but a balancing of the two into a complete and whole force user, one with a new philosophy and practice of the Force.
Just my .02.
Using Skywalker to describe a group of people that aren't family is really stupid, but I can see them doing this.How about the theory that Skywalker doesn't refer to anyone of the Skywalker clan but it's the name of a new order/ army?
Using Skywalker to describe a group of people that aren't family is really stupid, but I can see them doing this.
Its already canon in Thrawn: Alliances.Using Skywalker to describe a group of people that aren't family is really stupid, but I can see them doing this.
That doesn't mean it's not stupidIts already canon in Thrawn: Alliances.