A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
wolvie2020 said:Actually, I'd have to whole heartedly disagree with you there. The 'creepiness,' was one of the main staples created Ditko in the 1st place. Many other artists did it, (when suited,) after Ditko, and before and after McFarlane. It's a dramatic effect, used when needed.
That's what I was really getting at. He went too far with it & took him into this whole "creature of the night" motif that just isn't him. He would never sit in a big web w/spiders crawling all over him. That was just sick.shinlyle said:True that.
There are times when Spidey NEEDS to look a little creepy. My only problem with McFarlane was that he overused that aspect. Hell, look at "The Child Within" back in SSM. That was one arc where Spidey NEEDED to look a little crappy from time to time, and Buscema nailed it.
On the other hand, there are some artists that make Spider-Man look so warm and fuzzy that it's amazing that any of the bad guys even stress when he shows up. Marc Buckingham comes to mind. He is a great artist, and he drew some killer Spidey stories with Paul Jenkins, but he never drew a very intimidating Spider-Man. It would have been nice to see Spidey lurking in the shadows or looking a little tough in those pages.
Spider-Man is just one of those characters that seems to get reinterpreted by every single artist who takes over. No two artists fraw him the same. Ever since the transition from Ditko to Romita, the changes from artist to artist have been there. Nowadays, people have so many versions of Spidey to emulate that they have to come up with their own...and at least that keeps the pot from going cold (artisticly, anyways).
Remember the days when you & I never agreed on anything? Then came Civil War.Dragon said:Ditko went for dramatic, at times scary, but never creepy. His Spidey was fluid and agile, not contorted and and unnatural like McFarlane's.
Dragon said:Ditko went for dramatic, at times scary, but never creepy. His Spidey was fluid and agile, not contorted and and unnatural like McFarlane's.
Chris Wallace said:He still looked more like a superhero than a creature.
But yeah, some creepy elements do still show up-to lesser extremes. A good example would be Campbell.
Chris Wallace said:Again, you computer's screwing up on you. I'm betting the image you were TRYING to post was the one w/the thugs & guns in a big old web ball.
Ash J. Williams said:Never heard of him.
SpideyInATree said:I'd like to see you draw better than him.
Nope. And I can see the Ditko covers just fine.Dangerous said:Dude thats the one that's right there, right above your post can you not see it?
ASM Vol2 #30 (#471) JMS' first issue.
I now say this to you; remember when you & I never agreed on anything?Cyclops said:I'm not a fan of McFarlane. All of his people have potatoes for heads, and there's a point beyond which Spider-Man's tendons would have snapped he was contorting so far.