If this were a 33-year-old man who had sex with a 17-year-old young actress who he thought was 18-20 years old, people wouldn't be looking at Singer like a monster.
If it was as graphic as the plaintiff alleges (and I find this all highly suspect) then yes, it is ugly and horrible. But if it is just the case of a director partying with young men, and they have sex and the young man who thought it would benefit his career doesn't get what he wanted so he cried "rape".... Then I really don't feel like his case is solid.
He waited 15 years to bring this back up after his alleged initial try back in 1999. Now he re-opens this a month before the director's largest film is released? It seems like a publicity/cash getter.
But again, if this were a straight, male director who had sex with a young actress who was 17 but looked 18-21 and the director didn't know... this wouldn't even make the front page. The issue (if Singer only had consensual sex with a man he thought was of age) is that Singer is gay and this reminds the general public about it. While most of the public opinion has turned positive toward LGBT... it is still something that can hurt a studio's bottom line. Which is why there are VERY VERY few films headlined by openly gay actor/actresses. So FOX may distance themselves from Singer for the publicity this brings alone.
I truly hope that he's innocent. First, because if these allegations are true, the are horrible. Secondly, Singer (though neurotic) seemed to be a brilliant, likable guy -- and not the type to abuse his power, or even think he had power. He seemed humble. It would be a shame to have to hate him.
-R