LightningFlash
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2008
- Messages
- 3,567
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 31
Excuse me? Really? Did I imply it like that?
Where did I say Raimi is the only one able to do these films? That's right, I didn't.
I simply said I'm perfectly content with Raimi, and would be a bit worried if someone else took over. Directors taking over in the middle of a franchise can be bad. The camera work, the lighting, the whole feel. Just look at the big jump from Batman Returns to Batman Forever. The whole feel changes. Makes it feel like a different movie apart from the series, and I don't like that.
Well BR to BF is different, because it was a trilogy, one that Tim Burton had a plan for, but then decided to hand the reigns to Schumacher. Spider-Man 4 with a different director wouldn't be a big change because the trilogy has ended; a supposedly "new" saga would be at the start of S-M 4, either just by one more movie or even three new movies. The Osborns are deceased, and Spider-Man 4 would call for new storylines, something that I think Raimi won't be able to handle, imo.
And if not Spider-Man 4, then a reboot series(which I think is a given in the next ten, maybe fifteen years down the line)...
but I certainly think Abrams might be better for a Superman film. Spider-Man is OK right now(and I really have hopes for a Spider-Man 3.1, that is actually as good as the novelization, then maybe I'll have a change of mind with the third film), but Superman needs a brilliant movie from the get-go. Superman Returns war horrendous, plus Smallville is garbage, and yet it's still on the air which makes no sense.