RockSP
MYTH SMITH ∞!!!
- Joined
- May 11, 2003
- Messages
- 15,885
- Reaction score
- 10,230
- Points
- 103
Yo bring this dude back, he would be ill in the Outsiders.
As long as he isn't constantly being punked by Batman...
Yo bring this dude back, he would be ill in the Outsiders.
I think Batman and MX would be too busy punking others.As long as he isn't constantly being punked by Batman...
Yo bring this dude back, he would be ill in the Outsiders.
Naw, he'd just be Token Black Angry Guy #14579, where every couple of issues he goes on a two-page rant about whatever written to subtly hint that he's a paranoid loon, and then Batman gives him orders and he follows them.
If you're gonna do it, give the guy his own book where he can kick Whitey's ass on his own terms.
And while you're at it, have Superman kick Whitey's ass too. If the world needs saving from space aliens go get the Fresh Prince and the Fly to do it, and let Superman solve a real problem somewhere for a change.
We don't have enough to give good examples and he would "fit" as a hero not sponsored by a white guy, (John Henry Irons, John Stewart), Something I am tired of.
Why do we have to have "validation" by some white "oldhead" before a black hero can be seen as "legit?"
Angry black guys don't have to be Angry Black Guys. It's possible to write them appropriately. That book WildStorm did about the fake superhero team and the commies or whatever, that one did the angry black guy pretty well, I thought.Naw, he'd just be Token Black Angry Guy #14579, where every couple of issues he goes on a two-page rant about whatever written to subtly hint that he's a paranoid loon, and then Batman gives him orders and he follows them.
I would agree with that. Black people are no longer a "new story concept" that needs to be introduced under the stewardship of a sure-thing like Batman or Superman.fifthfiend said:If you're gonna do it, give the guy his own book where he can kick Whitey's ass on his own terms.
I can see that, but I'd argue that Batman is a much more applicable choice for that kind of justice. There's a letter in the back of Legends of the Dark Knight #50 that completely changed the way I thought about Batman, and I wish every creator who touches the character were required to read it. It's also the single best argument for why lettercols should be in every comic book.fifthfiend said:And while you're at it, have Superman kick Whitey's ass too. If the world needs saving from space aliens go get the Fresh Prince and the Fly to do it, and let Superman solve a real problem somewhere for a change.
I can see that, but I'd argue that Batman is a much more applicable choice for that kind of justice. There's a letter in the back of Legends of the Dark Knight #50 that completely changed the way I thought about Batman, and I wish every creator who touches the character were required to read it. It's also the single best argument for why lettercols should be in every comic book.
this guy sounds like a closed minded racist *****e with a chip on his shoulder. i liked this story better when it was in GL #76
This is a good point but Mr.Terrific and Black Lightning have been playing bigger roles in the big picture events lately.
Black Lightning in particular I would love to see more of. Love that he is on JLA. His powers are aesthetic, the character has had great development over the years, and the character has historical significance in the DCU and the comic industry. I was hoping he was going to be the leader of the JLA and i had thought he should be added to the "Trinity" and make it a Quartet t:
Hmmmn.
I don't think he wants it.
I only say it because he's been in charge (pun intended) before and was able to give it up each time w/o any indication that he didn't want to.
The character is Batman with no traumatic childhood, no advanced globetrotting education, but more physical training. If he could be bothered to learn a martial art,.... he would become dangerous.
If you add him to the trinity, it becomes an off balanced Quartet. Sorry to Say, Green Lantern or Zattana(sp) would be better choices for a forth.
V.
You point out one significant difference between the rich white male power structure, and a bunch of muggers and mob bosses.Batman's for beating up muggers and mob bosses.
So do those who run the world. He's a perfect match. Hell, unless he's fighting them, he probably IS one of them, as one of the wealthiest men in the DCU.fifthfiend said:He lurks in shadows and inspires terror.
We've seen, so many times, why that can't work. No, this takes Batman. This takes finesse. No one needs to know about this, no one can know about it. No hero needs to be smeared and crucified and demonized over this. Batman just does it quickly and quietly, and hey, look, there's a bunch of protections for low-income workers, and affordable housing for low-income families.fifthfiend said:Batman can only fight The Man in vicious little morally ambiguous ways around the edges. Superman can just stand up and say No, Capitalist Robber-Baron, you're not going to mistreat these employees / repo this guy's house / beat these demonstrators / throw this innocent dude in jail / etc., and deck any ****in' cop who tries to tell him no.
Batman is only more applicable if you assume standing up to power has to be mean and vicious and morally ambigous and angsty and all that ****. Me, I just want to see a dude in bright red, yellow and blue punch The Man in the face, an' tell him to stop being an *******.
And you sound like a closed-minded racist *****e with a chip on your shoulder and no real understanding of race relations, poverty, or socioeconomics, and the way they work in this country. I liked this thread better before you had to go and say that.this guy sounds like a closed minded racist *****e with a chip on his shoulder. i liked this story better when it was in GL #76
You point out one significant difference between the rich white male power structure, and a bunch of muggers and mob bosses.
We've seen, so many times, why that can't work. No, this takes Batman. This takes finesse. No one needs to know about this, no one can know about it. No hero needs to be smeared and crucified and demonized over this. Batman just does it quickly and quietly, and hey, look, there's a bunch of protections for low-income workers, and affordable housing for low-income families.
A trillions-of-dollars payroll that funds the FBI, CIA, NSA, Secret Service, the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, the National Guard, the entire defense industry, and all broadcast and the majority of print media.
No amount of finesse is gonna keep them sending the army after you if you run around terrorizing US Congressmen. I mean setting aside the issue of who's going to be demonized - though I suspect a guy who runs around dressed as a demon isn't gonna be the hardest mark for this - in my reading of political history, character assassination has tended to be a whole lot less effective than the other kind.
I mean I'm not saying they can't demonize Superman, I'm just saying what I'd like to see is a Superman who doesn't really give a **** whether anybody demonizes him. I'm not asking for Superman to rewrite US housing policy or pass a constitutional amendment or anything like that, he just needs to keep this bunch of protesters getting beat up by the cops, or this family getting thrown out of their house by bankers. It doesn't have to "work", except for a comic-book value of "work".
Dude your superman sounds like he would spend to much time on little crap, and not enough on much more important issues. Superman can protect protestors, by telling them to find other ways to get their point accross. You want superman to stop a family from getting thrown out their house, tell them to pay their damn mortgage.
Actually:
Superman could make millions of dollars by buying a sack of coal,.. then buy flat out as many houses as he wants then put all those folk in homes.
The reason he doesn't ties into that Boyscout upbringing.
V.
I dunno, Golden age superman beat down wife beaters, and did all that "protect the little guy" stuff, back then he was short tempered.
Yeah, defending the defenseless is so dumb and low-level.Dude your superman sounds like he would spend to much time on little crap
Ah yes, the great American tradition of shutting the **** up and submitting to the authority of the government. Good to see the conservatives are still defending liberty by despising those who exercise it.Eros said:Superman can protect protestors, by telling them to find other ways to get their point accross.
You want a family to pay their damn mortgage, tell the upper class to stop screwing them over and pay them the money and benefits that they deserve. Pencil-necked desk jockeys make millions every year while hard-working people all over this country and this world struggle for pennies. And it's because of people like you, who don't believe in hard work, who don't believe in the working class, who believe in nothing more than capitalism, competition, victory by any means necessary, and stepping on the little guy to win big.Eros said:You want superman to stop a family from getting thrown out their house, tell them to pay their damn mortgage.
I'm from about an hour and a half north of Smallville, and trust me, no one down there taught him that. He doesn't do it because he doesn't believe that direct interference is a wise plan (basically, he's the opposite of The Authority.)The reason he doesn't ties into that Boyscout upbringing.
Yeah, he was so stupid when he helped people in real, meaningful ways. What a dumbass, defending the defenseless. Such a sucker.I dunno, Golden age superman beat down wife beaters, and did all that "protect the little guy" stuff, back then he was short tempered.
I'm not, but does it matter?who in here is actually black?