killing me. . . . why do you say that?
i mean they aren't just asterisks. loki fundmentally impacted the entire MCU so it's a must watch
killing me. . . . why do you say that?
Maybe? I wouldn't call him either. He's a version of Nathaniel Richards who became "The One Who Remains," the founder of the TVA. His personality here is about as different from Immortus as it is from Kang. But I wouldn't be surprised if, come Season 2, the variant now openly running the TVA in Loki's timeline is going by Immortus and operating with a more rigid attitude.So this version isn't technically the "Conqueror." Does that mean I'm right that he's Immortus even if he wasn't officially called that? I mean, he's functionally very similar.
He won't be the Conqueror they will probably save the Conqueror act for the movies.So this version isn't technically the "Conqueror." Does that mean I'm right that he's Immortus even if he wasn't officially called that? I mean, he's functionally very similar.
Also Norman Osborne if certain rumors prove true.So we have Val assembling her thing and now many forms of Kang. Mandarin coming in a month too and hopefully he won't be a one and done.
Doctor Doom in the future once F4 hits.
Magneto MCU when X-Men get established.
Villains are looking good now that the original Avengers are gone.