I'm happy for BB it doesn't get enough credit due to TDK, in my opinion BB is great as TDK.
The term "masterpiece" kinda loses its meaning when it's assigned to films like B89...
Without Downey Jr Iron Man is still a good story told without any false pretention. No morals or larger-than-life hollow speeches. And Downey wasn't the only good acting job there.
Now, flaws more or less, TDK is a masterpiece.
I thought Howard was awful in Iron Man and Bridges didn't do anything other than the same schtick he's been doing for years. Paltrow was surprisingly good. I was expecting her to be the weakest part of the movie but she wasn't.
Without Downey Jr Iron Man is still a good story told without any false pretention. No morals or larger-than-life hollow speeches. And Downey wasn't the only good acting job there.
Now, flaws more or less, TDK is a masterpiece.
The term "humour" kinda loses its meaning when it's forced into posts like that one... :meow:
And without Nolan and Bale, BB (or whatever Batman V WB made) would have been awful and TDK probably wouldn't have happened at all.I doubt it...without downey and favs, IM would've been "Fantastic Four" level at best....the cliche end fight, imo, proves that the bare bones of the script was a cliched mess before those two fixed it
I doubt it...without downey and favs, IM would've been "Fantastic Four" level at best....the cliche end fight, imo, proves that the bare bones of the script was a cliched mess before those two fixed it
Or that one.
Then maybe Fantastic Four was a good movie ruined by terrible actors and a bad director. I can buy that.
But it is all natural; if you put good actors and a good director in a movie things start to get much better. It's like taking Batman Begins' director, actors and concept and add to it an actual good script with good dialogues and better action... you get TDK which is a masterpiece. See?
Now, how does the IM's final fight being cliché (because it is cliché) prove that the rest of the movie is any bad anyways?
Absolutely, it ends being just "humour" and starts to be intelligent funny critique with a base.
The final fight was bad in Iron Man, but the portrayal of the terrorists was pretty awful too. Those were the two worst things about the movie. The terrorists were complete caricatures. And TDK is not a masterpiece. It's got its share of problems just like Iron Man or Batman Begins. Biggest problems in TDK are Bale's Batman voice, the ferry boat plot, and the sonar plot.
Iron Man was a great, fun movie that was competently made. But it was a safe film that pretty much followed the generic comicbook formula. Downey Jr was the only thing in the film that created a sense of originality and surprise because of his wonderful, deadpan and eccentric performance.
Everything else was still pretty good if underwhelming. Hurt served the role well until he just became a one-note maniacal madman who was willing to use his war machine to kill innocent people on the street. Sorry, but a savvy businessman like him wouldn't be so obvious or stupid. The showdown just felt really forced.
The terrorist sub-plot is ok but I agree that they are pretty much caricature "bad-guys". This is ok for a comicbook movie but a bit dissapointing because the villain is just so...dull.
On the plus side, the CGI is top-notch. But really, an Iron Man sequel will have a lot more promise now that they will be able to invest some real time and money into the project. It is no TDK though. Remove Ledger and you still have Bale, Oldman, Eckhart, Freeman and the always wonderful Caine. The action scene involving the bat-pod is better than anything in Iron Man. Give me the interrogation scene anyday over all of Iron Man.
the list isnt the best but Spider-Man 2 is better than Iron Man....and TDK....well that movie should be number 1 without hesitation...Batman Begins at 2 or 3....
I agree with your post though I'll correct you on one thing. William Hurt was the general in the Incredible Hulk. He's not in Iron Man. The actor you are referring to in Iron Man is Jeff Bridges. Easy to get them mixed up though. They're pretty similar actors.
There's a whole bunch of elements in TDK that I would take all day long over anything in Iron Man. Another one that I would add to your list is the part where Joker interrogates the fake Batman. Or the ending, which is heartbreaking to watch yet shows exactly why Batman is such an icon, being willing to take the blame for horrific things he didn't do while continuing to fight for the people who will now hunt him down like an animal.
The final fight was bad in Iron Man, but the portrayal of the terrorists was pretty awful too. Those were the two worst things about the movie. The terrorists were complete caricatures.
And TDK is not a masterpiece. It's got its share of problems just like Iron Man or Batman Begins. Biggest problems in TDK are Bale's Batman voice, the ferry boat plot, and the sonar plot.
TDK did the exact same thing. That movie didn't go to any new places either. Why does TDK get a free pass? Because it took itself ultra-serious? Because it borrowed from successful crime films like Heat? Borrowed the execution of its plot twists from movies like "Saw"? Those films were successful in the past too. When people start throwing around words like "masterpiece" and "perfect" for TDK I can't help but think the film is vastly overrated. Without Heath Ledger's Joker the film is pedestrian at best.
a true comic book masterpiece will have great drama and great action.
tdk has great drama but nolan can't film true action for ****.
it has upped the ante but can certainly be bettered.
Yeah well, the terrorists in IM could have been much better. But even when the final fight was average it wasn't actually "bad," was it? It was under my expectattions yes, but "bad," I don't know.
I can compare BB to TDK any day because they share the same cast and elements and in every item TDK beats BB by far.
If I compare Iron Man to TDK, TDK is better which doesn't mean Iron Man is any bad. But TDK had a brilliant plot and almost all of it was brilliantly done.
And comapred to the rest of the movies of the genre, TDK is top 3. On top of that, most - if not all - of the movie had a outstanding result. That makes me label it a masterpiece. But yes, I give you Bale's bat-voice, that was weak.
Now I have to ask, why the ferrys and sonar plots were a problem for you. For me they were simply some of the best parts of the movie. But I'm genuinely curious.
Bales voice is not terrible......I felt the acting by the citizens during the ferry boats scene was pretty bad, and I felt the idea of a "pick your poison" climax has been done so many times in action movies that it was no good. I expected the Joker's climax to be less cliched than a doomsday scenario. I felt the sonar thing was ******ed. Over the top and pointless. Reminds me of the microwave emitter in Batman Begins. Over the top and pointless. TDK loses quite a bit of steam after the Joker visits Harvey at the hospital. But the final conversation between Batman and the Joker is excellent, except for Bale's terrible voice. And then the final scene with Dent, Gordon, and Batman is one of the best in the entire movie.
Bales voice is not terrible......
Have to agree Bale's batvoice is unbelievably awful in places. I think some people are kidding themselves sometimes when they say it is awesome and the like. It really works well in some places but in others it is atrocious. Like in the poor man's Long Halloween scene with Dent, Gordon and Bats:In the final scene with the Joker it definitely is.
"This city...just showed you...that it's full of people...ready to believe in GOOOOOOOOD!"
"You'll be in a padded cell forever!"
"There won't be any fireworks!"
All 3 of these lines featured HORRIBLE delivery from Bale. The one time he got it right during that scene was when he whispered, "What did you do?" with that look of horror and nervousness on his face. Ledger's performance during that scene was flawless and it felt laughable hearing him have to respond after Bale's "You'll be in a padded cell forever!" growl.