Mutant 77
Supreme Keeper of the X-Men Movie Continuity
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2014
- Messages
- 1,880
- Reaction score
- 226
- Points
- 73
Well, my questions are simple... they are related to Swamp Thing's origins.
1- Is Holland's bio-restorative serum having been "retconned" (by Moore) as totally useless/unnecessary in the creation of Swamp Thing? I'm saying this because the other members of the Parliament of Trees have been created when an animal burning in flames have met the earth. No serum involved, of course. This angle kinda disappoints me, but I'm asking anyway...
2- In the new DC continuity, is Swamp Thing still the creator of the Parliament of Trees via time travel? And are the older members of the Parliament to be considered "copies" of Swamp Thing/Alec anyway? I just haven't read those stories (yet).
3- Is the new DC continuity discarding the Alan Moore origin?
4- Was the final Alan Moore ST story suitable for being considered as the "definitive ending" of Swamp Thing, theorically speaking?
Thank you so much.
1- Is Holland's bio-restorative serum having been "retconned" (by Moore) as totally useless/unnecessary in the creation of Swamp Thing? I'm saying this because the other members of the Parliament of Trees have been created when an animal burning in flames have met the earth. No serum involved, of course. This angle kinda disappoints me, but I'm asking anyway...
2- In the new DC continuity, is Swamp Thing still the creator of the Parliament of Trees via time travel? And are the older members of the Parliament to be considered "copies" of Swamp Thing/Alec anyway? I just haven't read those stories (yet).
3- Is the new DC continuity discarding the Alan Moore origin?
4- Was the final Alan Moore ST story suitable for being considered as the "definitive ending" of Swamp Thing, theorically speaking?
Thank you so much.
Last edited: