SpaceWay2009
Wall-Crawler
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2009
- Messages
- 1,721
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
^Yeah, and the big budget that this movie would have.
Me and my dad talk about this a lot. He told me something that I sort of agree with. I think there should only be one villain per movie. Look at the series history, SM1 and SM2 both had one villain...good movies. SM3...3 villains...and...well...lets just say it was a boo movie . I think that a sequel can be great with just one villain
Hell ----ing no, thank you.The Lizard is the obvious choice, and I hope it's him. But if not, I'd be happy with any of the following: Chameleon, Scorpion, Shocker, even Morbius.
Hell ----ing no, thank you.
Well, we all have our own opinions, I suppose. Afterall, I so badly want to see Chameleon turn up as a main villain in one of the installments.He can be done very cool IMO. He's my fourth choice, though.
Well, we all have our own opinions, I suppose. Afterall, I so badly want to see Chameleon turn up as a main villain in one of the installments.
Oh... whoopsDid you not notice who was first on my list?
I believe that Lizard would the obvious choice.I believe an adaptation of Kraven's last hunt with Lizard in place of Vermin would be perfect.But I don't know if Rami would like the dark tone of the story or if he has even heard of it.
In a sense that there arent to many great villains that would make for a good movie
I know Spider-man has a great comic book rougue gallery but honeslt i feel alot of them dont translate well to film in a snse that they might come across stupid or corny
We already saw the big 3 in terms of villains(Dr.Octopus,Green Goblin,Venom) and of course Sandman and while Doc Ock and Green Goblin were done right obviously Sandman and Venom were on the bad end of just a really poorly written script and plot.
I always though Electro would make for a great villain but thanks to Tim Story i doubt that will happen since from some odd reason he gave Dr.Doom electorcity powers(IMO one of the dumbest decisions in comic book movie history)
I think Lizard would maybe come acorss a little to far fetched even for Raimis movies, i mean a man lizard on the loose? idk maybe thats just me i mean it sure is better than Morbius ill say
Kraven, personaly opinion i just dont find him that interesting
Scorpion i think could maybe work but theres the issue of can he hold a movie on its own
vulture, he maybe as well could work but idk the idea of Spider-Man battling some old guy in a bird suit might come across a bit corny
Shocker and Rhino are just thugs and probably would be that interesting to the general public
This movie would have been perfect for Venom to be the main villainif raimi hade put Sandman and GG2 as the villains in spidey 3 and Brock would be a charcter thus setting him up for 4
Idk maybe its just me i just iam not feeling the rest of the villain rouge gallery in terms of what kind of story they can bring to the table
If i hade to pick id maybe go with Scorpion or Lizard
I don't think the villains have to have a personal connection to the hero to be interesting and carry a story. That helps, obviously, but forcing it like Sandman is just a detriment. If the threat is good enough, and the set pieces exciting enough, you don't need that personal connection.
Not that there isn't some truth in it, but I never looked it this way. I don't think most of the audience would. They would see that as a tail of a man acting like a Scorpion. Besides, he can be way more agile than Ock and faster and stronger than Spidey. You can add plasma bolts shots from his tail, too.I'd looove to see Scorpion. Problem with him, though, is that the effects which would be utilized would too similar to Doc Ock. As it seems that each film chooses a villain with a new, exciting angle, I fear that Scorpion's killer mechanical tail will be viewed as old hat.