Days of Future Past Bryan Singer Directing X-Men: Days of Future Past - Part 6

is it possible hank from the past and wolverine from future travel to another timeline o_O

would explain marsden reports, and the set, i really don't believe thats the 70s at all, it would be a huge leap to go from 1st class to moden look in 1973
 
I was expecting a less modern version of the sub-base on the 70's, to give us something new, instead of the same look as original trilogy.

but I guess they didnt feel inspired to design and show an earlier version
 
I was expecting a less modern version of the sub-base on the 70's, to give us something new, instead of the same look as original trilogy.

but I guess they didnt feel inspired to design and show an earlier version

i don't buy it

singer would be more creative then that, i think there is more to this then meets the eye, you can't try and convince the audience they are watching the past if it looks like the present
 
yeah apparently it is 1973 according to singer, technology was built to last huh

im expecting all the young Xmen to time travel, wolverine alone isn't very interesting
 
Last edited:
Bryan wants to tie films together.This Is why when we see Beast In Blue form he will be
more like classic beast than Vaughn's catbeast.

Wolverine may not be only time traveler.But some characters have to stay In future.

The james Marsden reports are because most likely there will be altered future at end of film where CYclops didn't die.
 
Bryan wants to tie films together.This Is why when we see Beast In Blue form he will be
more like classic beast than Vaughn's catbeast.

Wolverine may not be only time traveler.But some characters have to stay In future.

i'm thinking they may leave storm in the future, berry is pregnant after all and i'm sure singer must have known secretly in advanced otherwise that was a very stupid move by the actress

and it makes sense when you think beast and Xavier in the 70s alone and when most the team travel back to the 70s whats left is Future Xavier and another Xman, it equals it out quite well

but who knows
 
Well future Xavier might be traveling too.james Mcavoy mentioned possibilty of sharing screen with Patrick Stewart.Blink will probally be one since they have to get back towards end of film.My money Is on Kitty or Rogue(If Anna Paquin shoots more once true blood wraps) Joining wolverine.

Bryan could Intercut the X-Men In 73 trying to stop events with Magneto,Storm,Bishop,and Iceman In future VS Sentinles.
 
I like Hoult's 70s get up.
 
Is it confirmed that pic of Logan is the future version travelled back? I'm just going by the collar on that jacket (definitely a 70's 'take off in a strong wind' job).

I figure given his star appeal he likely will be a traveller, so those clothes might just be what he's given when he comes back (I'd rather not though) but it is possible whoever comes back gets Xavier to recruit the younger Logan a lot earlier.
 
Is it confirmed that pic of Logan is the future version travelled back? I'm just going by the collar on that jacket (definitely a 70's 'take off in a strong wind' job).

I figure given his star appeal he likely will be a traveller, so those clothes might just be what he's given when he comes back (I'd rather not though) but it is possible whoever comes back gets Xavier to recruit the younger Logan a lot earlier.

Doesn't work with origins, disconnects a lot of things, he wouldn't ever have lost his memory
 
I am confused as f***. :eek:

And...I kinda like it. :eek::up:

My initial reactions aside, I guess my question is did Beast come to the future? Did Logan go come to the past? How is that Cerebro--which is very much present-looking able to be a backdrop for either of these characters with either scenario.

And why isn't Beast mutated? There's no Nightcrawler around to use an image-inducer.

Hmm Overload.
 
Yeah, it's all :huh: worthy, which is exciting. But I have a feeling there's some intentional ****ery going on and all isn't what it appears to be... Whatever it appears to be.
 
I am confused as f***. :eek:

And...I kinda like it. :eek::up:

My initial reactions aside, I guess my question is did Beast come to the future? Did Logan go come to the past? How is that Cerebro--which is very much present-looking able to be a backdrop for either of these characters with either scenario.

And why isn't Beast mutated? There's no Nightcrawler around to use an image-inducer.

Hmm Overload.

Beast has used an image inducer as well. Might be the case here. Especially when he has the mind to build one.
 
Yeah, it's all :huh: worthy, which is exciting. But I have a feeling there's some intentional ****ery going on and all isn't what it appears to be... Whatever it appears to be.

I certainly hope you're right. Because from here it looks like another continuity fluster **** of epic proportions in the making. LOL :funny:
 
Since Singer actually tweeted "Welcome to 1973" I presume that the setting in the picture is in fact 1973.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"