TheVileOne
Eternal
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2002
- Messages
- 69,314
- Reaction score
- 13,902
- Points
- 103
I ended up seeing both Thor and Cap a second time though in 2D. I didn't like how either of them worked in 3D.
A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
I agree. Post converted 3D just looks so meh.I ended up seeing both Thor and Cap a second time though in 2D. I didn't like how either of them worked in 3D.
There can be good post converted 3D, just look at what Cameron is dong with 3D. If I am not mistaken it will take him 8 months to post convert it. On the otherhand you have CotT with sub 3 months conversion.I agree. Post converted 3D just looks so meh.
According to IMDB (it's not a sure thing but it'll probably pan out), they're using the Arri Alexa digital camera to shoot in dual-strip 3D.
And they have a stereographer from Avatar and the other post-converted Marvel films like Thor and Captain America.
If it's shot in 3D i will see it in 3D. If it's post converted i will see it in 2D.
2D for me
plus...every scene with IM flying would look incredible! I will be seeing it both ways. First, 3D because thats how they will show it in my local imax theaters...and them ill go see it 2-3 more times in 2D!I think alot of those shots would look pretty awesome in 3d. The debris flying across the streets as Ironman flies through the city battling the invaders. Hulk smashing through the walls and the scene of him running behind widow. Cap skydiving looks like it was designed FOR 3d. Thor throwing his hammer at the screen in the after credits teaser. Hawkeye jumping off the building. All those shots look like they'd look AMAZING in 3d.
3-D = overrated and overused.