What does his performance have to do with his musical career?
What happened before the movie came out is irrelevant. The performance speaks for itself, and people will have an opinion on it. Like The Joker said, there was a huge backlash when Heath was cast. He won people over. Leto didn't. It's that simple.
Being a cultural icon is totally irrelevant. If people hate tattoos then anyone with them in the movie would have been slammed for it. It would be like me saying people are biased against make up because they didn't like it on Ledger when they first saw it (which was a departure from his comic book look). If there was a bias against tattoos, anyone with them would have been criticized for it.
But that wasn't the case. It was that they looked stupid on the Joker. And still do. It was a bad design issue, not a bias against tattoos issue.
It is relevant if the character isn't cared about enough for anyone to even complain. Like regwec said, nobody really cares about El Diablo, so why would they complain.
To that affect, I've yet to see anybody complain about Harley's tattoos, even though they make even less sense than Joker's and are there just because.
There's certainly a bias here against Leto and his Joker. That much is undeniable.
That's a contradiction. If the general audience's only complaint was he wasn't in it enough then it wouldn't be "fashionable" to hate him if that was the dominant complaint.
Actually, it's not a contradiction. I meant it was fashionable to hate on Jared Leto in general, not just in his role as the Joker, among a lot of critics and media people. And I didn't say the general audience's only complaint was the length of time the Joker was in the movie, but it was the predominant complaint I saw. I thought Razzie nominations were for actors whose performances were almost universally panned. I didn't see that for Jared's Joker. I did see that for Cara Delevingne's Enchantress, but she wasn't even nominated.
Ledger's was a decent performance of a kind of elseworlds Joker. Shame about the stupid facepaint, though. Leto was similar: okay performance, dumb design choices.
We have still yet to see a great on-screen Joker.
Now there's a bias against Jared Leto in general, too? This just gets better and better. If that's the case you might as well accept then that he's never going to be loved in the role. Which it isn't. Leto's casting here alone was met with universal enthusiasm and excitement.
If the predominant complaint is he wasn't in it enough, that would imply audiences wanted to see more of him. If they hated the character, then they'd be glad to see as little as possible of him. So yeah it's a contradiction to say it's fashionable to hate him, but people wanted to see more of him. Who wants to see more of a character they loathe?
Cara Delevingne's character was a CGI'ed, voice modulated caricature. She barely got to give a performance. She was a cog in a CGI machine.
So that's your excuse as to why she shouldn't have been nominated even though it's clear she gave one of the worst performances in the movie? Voice modulation and CGI or no CGI, there's no way she shouldn't have been nominated while Leto was. Pure bias b.s., like you blaming her shoddy acting on her "being a cog in a CGI machine."
There is. And Jared can blame himself for a large chunk of it. His whole method thing was met with ridicule and mocking and that was for other roles too, not just Squad. But once the movie was released it was even worse. When it was announced he is gonna be in Blade Runner most reactions were jokes about his method acting and that we can await Harrison Ford punching him.
Add to that the fact that he is occasionally stunningly humorless (he just had to shoot down that green coat meme that happened) and people in general don't like him very much and like to make fun of him
There is. And Jared can blame himself for a large chunk of it. His whole method thing was met with ridicule and mocking and that was for other roles too, not just Squad. But once the movie was released it was even worse. When it was announced he is gonna be in Blade Runner most reactions were jokes about his method acting and that we can await Harrison Ford punching him.
Add to that the fact that he is occasionally stunningly humorless (he just had to shoot down that green coat meme that happened) and people in general don't like him very much and like to make fun of him
What we think of Letoker ...
Nicholson and Ledger's takes on the character would eat this love sick, ghetto Joker for breakfast.
Like among the couple-few good performances out of this, though.Nobody really cares about El Diablo, though.
You mean injuring his hand on a punch to body armor?Erm, the same version that hurt his own hand punching Batman and got killed minutes later is gonna wipe the floor with Leto's Joker, whose been active for decades?
Nobody really cares about El Diablo, though.
You mean injuring his hand on a punch to body armor?
There is no indication how long Letoker has been active. And he does NOTHING menacing or substance the entire movie besides be [()] whipped.
Ledger
Nicholson
Leto
Both in performance, and the level of menace to each Joker. Leto was a grown up Justin Bieber with clown makeup and stupid tattoos.
We're all laughing at this clown ass excuse for a Joker. In the DCEU, Harley Quinn is described as being more crazy and volatile than the Joker.
SMH
I thought you were referencing Nicholson, otherwise, what the hell are you talking about?Ledger's Joker didn't injure his hands, and he was throwing straight shots at Bale's Batman at the end of the film.
Joker is more than a mob boss. He's the antithesis to organized crime. So they didn't get that correct either. And we don't see him kill Robin. At least not Leto's take on the character. Of screen stuff doesn't count.Wildcard said:Given the fact that he killed Robin, I'd say that is an indication of him having been around for quite some time. And the fact that he has major pull in Gotham as a mob boss.
Harley > Joker in the DCEU. And more dangerous. More fearless. Pathetic.Wildcard said:Yeah, she was, and then she starts freaking out about not being able to swim right after when he crashes the car.
Well hardcore Batman fans is where the respect would actually be earned. Just like the love and admiration Nicholson, Hamill, and Ledger earned. Through production, not method acting hype.Wildcard said:And yet again, the only people who have major beef with Leto's Joker are a select few hardcore Batman fans. Otherwise, the general audiences responded positively to him. We're talking millions of people versus a small group
I thought you were referencing Nicholson, otherwise, what the hell are you talking about?
Joker is more than a mob boss. He's the antithesis to organized crime. So they didn't get that correct either. And we don't see him kill Robin. At least not Leto's take on the character. Of screen stuff doesn't count.
Harley > Joker in the DCEU. And more dangerous. More fearless. Pathetic.
Hunka Hunka
Well hardcore Batman fans is where the respect would actually be earned. Just like the love and admiration Nicholson, Hamill, and Ledger earned. Through production, not method acting hype.
And what are you talking about the majority of the public responded well to him?
He's nominated for a Razzie.
No one was out there praising Leto's Hot Topic Joker performance. Especially in the wake of Ledger.
Ghetto Joker? smh