• Secure your account

    A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.

  • Xenforo Cloud has scheduled an upgrade to XenForo version 2.2.16. This will take place on or shortly after the following date and time: Jul 05, 2024 at 05:00 PM (PT) There shouldn't be any downtime, as it's just a maintenance release. More info here

Legendary Pictures' 2014 Godzilla Reboot - Directed by Gareth Edwards

Status
Not open for further replies.
Who really cares? I'm hardly upset if something tries to steal Ninja Turtle's thunder.

Not like this Godzilla movie is a guaranteed slam dunk either.
 
Godzilla Stomps Into Theaters on May 16, 2014!

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=94743



FmXhml.jpg
It brings me great joy to see this thread bumped with actual news, although two of the writers credited for the screenplay are just a tad bit worrisome to me. Here's hoping that the good things I've heard about Borenstein are true.

BRING IT ON :up:.
 
Last edited:
WB has been doing alot of this lately. The hobbit on the next Xmen date. The Hangover on top of Fast six, now this over ninja turtles. If only the other studios would stand their ground. Their features would arguably topple WB at each juncture.

I don't think it's a *****ebag move by WB.
Yes other studios secured those dates but WB is also sticking to the dates that have worked for them in the past.
July as of late has worked out well , hence why they're releasing Hobbit on July 2014. Plus they didn't have a solid blockbuster for July 2014.

Hangover 2 was releasing during Memorial Day 2011 and it was succesful. So WB is doing it again with Hangover 3.
Hence why they're also going to try it again but Godzilla.
 
Why does Ninja Turtles deserve that date? I mean the movie isn't even in an active stage of production. It's already been delayed.
 
I have a feeling that Paramont is either gonna drop Ninja Turtles all together or fire Jonathan Leisbman.
 
I have a feeling that Paramont is either gonna drop Ninja Turtles all together or fire Jonathan Leisbman.

This was going to be a live-action flick right ?
WOuldn't be surprised if they made this a completely CG animated ( possibly mo-capped) movie.
 
This was going to be a live-action flick right ?
WOuldn't be surprised if they made this a completely CG animated ( possibly mo-capped) movie.

it still a live action feature. I dont have confidence in it for obvious reasons.
 
This was going to be a live-action flick right ?
WOuldn't be surprised if they made this a completely CG animated ( possibly mo-capped) movie.

They already tried that; while I thought it was good, it didnt do to well at the B.O.
 
isnt middle of may a bad realese date?

i dont want godzilla to underperform or bomb because it gets a bad date.
 
I have a feeling that Paramont is either gonna drop Ninja Turtles all together or fire Jonathan Leisbman.

They should also get rid of Michael Bay. Because that script was Transformers but with the Alien Turtles. Michael Bay can whine all he wants. But that was all him clearly. If I had to choose between a Michael Bay's Alien Turtles movie & no movie ? Then I choose no movie easily
 
Last edited:
Great to see that Godzilla finally has a release date. The wheels on the big machine are turning. :)
 
I have a feeling that Paramont is either gonna drop Ninja Turtles all together or fire Jonathan Leisbman.

I doubt that. If anything they are just hesitant to start production till they get their eggs in order. Considering how many properties they've lost recently, I see this more as a star trek situation more than anything. They've given the film a very strong release date, it's clear they not only have faith in the project but they also want it to do well(it's their next big thing). Makes sense they take their time(not everyone can do what Vaughn does with time).

Moreover Paramount wouldn't mess with Bay in such a way, not at this point.

They should also get rid of Michael Bay. Because that script was Transformers but with the Alien Turtles. Michael Bay can whine all he wants. But that was all him clearly. If I had to choose between a Michael Bay's Alien Turtles movie & no movie ? Then I choose no movie easily

psst, bay didn't write the TF treatment, it was developed by many people. For example, Spielberg had the property in dev. long before bay ever showed up(oh that's right, Spielberg had something to do with that crap? yea but he was only producer...you know like Bay is now). If anything, considering the success of TF and the similar 'properties' it has to the playmates toy line a logical pathway to explain that treatment that was leaked is that the Studio paid for and oversaw a script similar in nature to the other huge property that they already own they own. It's so simple as fans on the outside to see a similar name involved and make that immediate jump, but it's petty imo.
It's like fans seeing superman with a beard and trying to find himself and going, hey that must literally be Nolan's doing. Yes cause Nolan is some sort of single minded one trick pony that can only approach stories in one way and no one else in creative power would think to do it. I'm sure if Nolan produced the next blade movie he would have a beard and be trying to find himself.

long story short, fans will be fans.

but I digress.

I'm rooting for every film I listed I don't care about the bay hate or the love for the spirit of this project. Releasing this and Ninja Turtles on the same date is going to get executives fired. If turtles does even half of TF's business(and with that treatment it will do at least that), than this Godzilla film, coming off of the success of the last one will suffer big time...especially with the kids/families (where Avengers trounced Batman soundly). Ironically, I don't see how Godzilla can be any more interesting than a Battle LA, big destruction visuals and the promise of no tangible character work(at lest the kids can get behind shia and bee and the turtles..etc. The month of may has several dates to choose from and that's what I find funny about how WB has been approaching this. Thank goodness they avoided this silliness with MOS.

I'm very curious who's going to be the leads in Godzilla. People may hate that about TF but it's the burden every live action film faces. Bay works around this at the sneering of fan boys. A live action film needs human stars for a few reasons, one of the biggest is for the press circuit. Optimus can't be making jokes and telling dumb to letterman and I don't see Godzilla doing it either. Films such as Avengers and LOTR work around this in a much more seamless way.

As for Xmen, it's the sequel to a very successful reboot picture with strong name recognition. History has shown us that these films tend to be huge. It's the same reasoning that says Trek and Apes are going to be huge. Moreover, the ambition I'm seeing coming from that X project and Vaughn at the helm, Hobbit(yes also being in the same position) would be hurt, significantly. If anything this past summer the benefits of spreading the heavy hitters apart. If only ASM had come out a month earlier...

Hangover may be a huge title(though it's bound to do that second sequel type performance), the F&F property is stronger than it's ever been at the moment. And its' gunning for the same audience too. Not the comedy audience but who do you think watches R rated comedies such as Hang? Not old folks and not kids.
 
psst, bay didn't write the TF treatment, it was developed by many people. For example, Spielberg

So I will change my statement for future references. Fire anyone involved who worked on that Alien Turtles script & also fire anyone that approved & liked the script
 
isnt middle of may a bad realese date?

i dont want godzilla to underperform or bomb because it gets a bad date.

The Avengers came out at the beginning of May....it did pretty good.
 
a lot movies underperformed in the middle

if you are the first movie in may and if you are entertaining you will make a profit.
 
i hope Edwards will get enough creative control to make a good movie.
 
If that's the case then why can't WB place ANY movie in Summer 2014 on a date that isn't already occupied by another potentially huge tentpole?

Studios have been doing this forever, this is nothing new.

They think they'll do better against Ninja Turtles and TASM2's 3rd weekend and whatever comes out TASM2's 2nd weekend. Plus they've probably heard or read the script for NT as well. Until Paramount can get more details and then marketing campaign with a trailer that looks like it will be formidable competition, WB isn't moving.

This is the studios still staying clear of a Marvel/Spider-Man film. They have all the past figures and projections to know when to release a film. They have other films to roll out for the summer, this is a business not everyone takes a turn releasing films and is courteous. So location, location, location.

I'll give the edge to Godzilla because Legendary is involved, while they have some box office bombs, they've still got a great success rate.
 
They think they'll do better against Ninja Turtles and TASM2's 3rd weekend and whatever comes out TASM2's 2nd weekend. Plus they've probably heard or read the script for NT as well. Until Paramount can get more details and then marketing campaign with a trailer that looks like it will be formidable competition, WB isn't moving.

This is the studios still staying clear of a Marvel/Spider-Man film.

Assuming the Amazing Spider-Man sequel keeps that release date.
 
Assuming the Amazing Spider-Man sequel keeps that release date.

True, who knows Captain America 2 or Robopocalypse or X-Men 7 may end up there and TASM2 gets shuffled back a year or has the same early July release date.

X-Men already has their filming dates set for January and would be able to easily make that date even with reshoots.
 
Hollywood has had staring contests with release dates before. At one point, the Casino Royale sequel was being set the same date as Iron Man before it got moved to later in the fall. Sometimes cooler heads prevail, sometimes the studios decide to take the staring contest further.

Sometimes the studios are respectful and will let certain movies or other studios have the spot and sometimes where its appropriate they will be mean and try and take the same spot even if its already taken. Sometimes it is in retaliation if something similar happened before.

But honestly, I'm hardly upset that Godzilla is trying to take the same spot as Ninja Turtles. Not like Ninja Turtles is some highly anticipated reboot. It's already got a ton of bad buzz and Michael Bay attached.
 
But honestly, I'm hardly upset that Godzilla is trying to take the same spot as Ninja Turtles. Not like Ninja Turtles is some highly anticipated reboot. It's already got a ton of bad buzz and Michael Bay attached.

Just like all the TF films. At the very least the first TF had the curiosity buzz form the GA, and so will this...especially if there is any sort of buzz involved. We can moan and groan all we want about the script decisions but rest assured when the trailer drops, the (actual) target audience will drop whatever they're doing and zero in.

Godzilla needs clear skies, especially if it wants to reach out to anyone outside of the culty audience, like someone said, it's Legendary Pictures. It's hit and miss for them, especially when they branch into culty genre properties/material.
Hit and Miss.

Unless Godzilla starts some sort of dialogue, I don't see how this is anything more than a disaster film with a name? At least Pacific rim has something more to it(as far as we know). It's not going to be that easy a sell. If so this will be the first Legendary film to be big without the help of a directors name from the outset.
 
Last edited:
TMNT as a franchise has also been pretty hit and miss as of late. The 2007 CG movie didn't do that well.

The last time Hollywood attempted Godzilla it was one of the biggest gigantic budget embarrassments of all time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"