Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]323492[/split]
A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
Agreed, except for the acting. This film was really aweful, The Last Airbender level of bad, i'm shocked this film received so much praise in this threadDud out of *****
An absolute abomination on every level.
Braindead, illogical script
piss poor, blunt-as-a-shovel-to-the-face storytelling
ridiculously bad cliches done ad nauseum
raping of physics
hilarious, bottom-of-the-barrel special effects
pointless over-stuffing of useless peripheral characters for the sake of fan service
terrible acting
pointless, headache-inducing slapstick.
I'm not even going to bother with the whole "killing off Deadpool's trademark" complaint, but I will ask this...
What was the purpose of sealing off his mouth in the first place? Did they not have any mutants who had a power that was used through the mouth? If they had control of Deadpool, why couldn't they just prevent him from talking? It just seems like a flimsy excuse to remove his most notable asset because the producers, allegedly, think that a talking Deadpool wouldn't make a good villain.
Crap as a Wolverine film, crap as a connection to the established film series' continuity, and just a terrible film in general.
6/10
6/10
The Logan/Victor dynamic makes up for the bad CGI & weak villians
I wonder what you 2 would consider a bad movie.