here we go again. I see that you edited your post on the previous page, so I have more points to make to you.
first of all,
you do not get to decide for the entire playstation community what does and doesn't fit in their catalogue. just because
you are not into a certain series doesn't mean millions of others aren't into it. and before you tell me that you didn't say that: I have you quoted right here saying that they don't fit. you didn't word it as an opinion, you worded as if it is a fact.
The graphiX of Yakuza aren't on par with Sony's top 1st party games. In comparison, Yakuza games look like AA games.
so what? you probably haven't even played a lot of Yakuza games but the cutscene graphics can actually be very photorealistic sometimes. and who said that the graphics of a game has to be on par with Sony's top first party games in order to be considered as an acquisition by Sony?
Persona has a comic booky look and the cutscenes/talking scenes, iirc, are very different to most first party games by Sony.
And Just Dance is Just Dance...
this right here is you contradicting yourself. you are the one who said on page 4 that a game like Just Dance would help diversify Sony's slate. yet, just above, you complained that a game's graphics should disqualify it from being a part of Sony's slate. why then would you suggest Just Dance?
Persona and Just Dance are BOTH very different to most first party games by Sony, so why did you even bother trying to suggest Sony to diversify their slate at all?
Okay, why are you putting my words in my mouth.
I am not putting words in your mouth...quite the opposite actually have been quoting your posts and replying to specific pieces to each to make individual points.
I knew what I was typing. And you don't need to comment on every single thing Ive said. I might not said Aa game TWICE, but the other post, I was clearly stating Yakuza games don't look like an AAA game (AAA games on par with Sony's big games)...
I know what you were saying. Ever since page 4 of this thread your sentiment has been "I don't think this fits, so Sony shouldn't buy it" or "I don't like this series, so Sony shouldn't buy it" and even if that isn't what you meant, that is what it
sounded like. it's as if you are thinking only about yourself.
like give it a rest. It is coming across as nitpicky.
I'm not going to "give it a rest". I have tried to talk to you about this in a level headed way with politeness, and respect. this is my style of posting. I have conversed with everyone on this forum in this way. but for some reason, with you, instead of showing a mutual respect, you decide to be hostile and unfriendly.
It is coming across as nitpicky.
you say it is me being nitpicky, I said it is me calling you out on something questionable you said. why do you even bother to have discussions with me? you might as well just ignore my posts if you don't like talking to me.