Carcharodon
Avenger
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2001
- Messages
- 14,844
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
oooooooooh....look at all the big font and pretty colors!!
oooooooooh....look at all the big font and pretty colors!!
It depends on what is at stake. It is unfortunate. But please tell me when was the last time the "innocent" did not suffer in a conflict? Most of these guys made their own beds with their associations.
This ain't Stratego!
Can't tell if your joking but if your not take your head out of your ass. You do know that regardless of how bad war is, countries do have and for the most part follow the rules. There are rules to war moron. It's something terrorists don't have the balls to stick to. My point was, in regards to the terrorists, why should we?
Don't be cruel.Can't tell if your joking but if your not take your head out of your ass.
Letting a 100 guilty people go free to rape and murder again makes no sense.
And there's the one that says "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the the one".
That's how real heroes are born. Guys that throw themselves on grenades to save their squad.
If I can save hundreds, thousands or millions (sorry Mr Spakle ) I will do just that. If this one guy has known associates who are known terrorists and intel has them plotting something, wellllllll guess what.
What if we suspect someone is terrorist and later it turns ot they weren't terrorists? Is it moral to torture an innocent perosn who was just suspected of being a terrorist?
All you've proved is that your Bible is worthless, chock full of contradictory teachings, and a schizophrenic "God", blathering nonsense at whatever whim he fancies.
You're all pathetic.
I don't believe in torturing "suspected" terrorists for that same reason. If you look back a page or so I had used the words "proven" or something of that nature in regards to only torturing people we have found out as fact are terrorists.
Hmmm... well, according to the Bible, all people are pathetic, but something tells me you don't want to hear that. t: It's funny... I've never met a purely intellectual atheist... I've only met normal well-meaning folk who became frustrated when they couldn't fit my big giant God in their normal-sized well meaning head. Which gives me a question: what's the difference between a contradiction and a paradox?
Regardless, on the topic:
The ends does not justify the means simply because the end cannot certify the effectiveness of the means. If we could compare lives for lives, sure, Waterboard away, but we can't, because we can't prove that extreme torture is effective.
Should we WaterBoard Terror Suspects to Save Lives?
Absolutely yes.
We should also teleport Bin Laden and all middle-eastern terrorists into Gitmo with a wiggle of our noses. But is it possible?
Are people in Western culture generally taught anything that we would endure incalculable pain and death for?
This is the problem: suspected terrorists are being tortured for information they may not have to give. We're detaining people without allowing due process, and if we get information through torture, we can't use that info against them in court because of the means we used to get the information.
The argument isn't about what terrorists deserve, it's the means we're using to detain suspected terrorists (the key word being "suspected"), which many have insisted are ineffective, not to mention completely unconstitutional.
If you are captured on the battle field, shooting at our guys, you have no rights.....no due process!! This is war.
Bin Laden said:If you are captured on the battle field, shooting at our guys, you have no rights.....no due process!! This is (holy) war.
If you are captured on the battle field, shooting at our guys, you have no rights.....no due process!! This is war.
But what if the Taliban has been using press gang tactics? They could have gone around and captured some farmer's family and demand that the guy fight for the taliban or they will kill his family. Would that guy really be a terrorist?Everything is not so clear cut. There are rules to war, you can't do what you please just because a war was declared.
If you are captured on the battle field, shooting at our guys, you have no rights.....no due process!! This is war.
The ends don't justify the means
We invaded their country, do they not have the right to defend themselves?
Tourture?No,because you become your enemy in the process.Your no better than them.
Your opinion.
Moving on...
They invaded our country!
We just returned the favor.....
Do the means justify the ends? Is a terrorist being protected from torture good justifaction or a good excuse when we fail to stop them?
Yeah we got another thousand dead, but don't worry guys, the terrorist is perfectly fine. Not a scratch on him, and that is way more important than stopping terrorist attacks.
It's a matter of priority. Innocent lives more important than a terrorist's right not to be tortured.