You're all quickly heading for a dead end by debating what will ultimately come down to a matter of taste.
Like
@shauner111, I can personally and distinctly identify the creative identity of
"The Batman". But I can also understand, intellectually, where this
"patchwork" impression can come from.
I'd say there's a good chance that this will
(or could) disappear in the next film, as it's not uncommon for the first installment to be where a director is taking his marks before really unleashing his creativity later on. I mean, I could argue that in the same way, Burton and Nolan first Batman film were showing their influence while their second film was really where the singularity of their vision was finally cemented.
For the record, when I went to see TDK, I was actually a bit surprised by the atmosphere of the movie, which was not exactly what I was expecting after Begins, and even the trailers.
That whole Blade Runner thing that everyone was talking about
(which in the end was honestly quite shy) was completely gone. But at the same time, other aspects remained and asserted themselves to definitely define Nolan's Batman.
So yeah, my point is that Reeves is still at the beginning of this journey. His approach to that universe will continue to refine to become more and more unique. Those who didn't immediately fall in love with it are maybe in for a slightly longer game of seduction...