I disagree.The gospel passages about “the Son of Man coming on the clouds” (Mark 13:26, 14:62, for example and Thessalonians 4:16-17) are about Jesus’ vindication, his “coming” to heaven from earth. The parables about a returning king or master (for example, Luke 19:11-27) were originally about God returning to Jerusalem, not about Jesus returning to earth.
But just as important...Paul was writing specifically to the Thessalonians at this time because they were led to believe that when Christians died before the return of Christ they would miss out on seeing the Kingdom fully realized on earth (this is why it's important to read scripture with historical context)
The entire point of the scripture is that the dead will not miss out on the resurrection as they originally thought. He was using scripture and phrases they would understand (cloud symbolism) to teach and correct them. It's easy to see how so many here in western culture had misunderstood that scripture. You really need to have some knowledge of OT word pictures, first century ideas of imperial coronations (crowning of kings), and an awareness of second temple Judaism to understand the imagery Paul uses in this passage.
The language of Jesus coming on clouds and everyone going up to meet him, should not be understood literally, but should instead be seen as a powerful image of divine kingship.
In the first century, kings would return to the city victorious from battle and be paraded back into his city.
You will recall that they actually did this to Jesus on Palm Sunday. The striking contrast is that Jesus was riding on a donkey, not a white horse; he didn’t have an army, only a hopeful crowd of peaceful followers and fans.
The trumpets blasting indicate a victorious procession and anthem upon Christ’s return (v. 16). The clouds should rightfully be understood as exalting Christ as divine. In both the Old and New Testaments the cloud(s) speak of divinity—God’s presence.
You see this with the cloud by day which led the Hebrews out of Egypt, the cloud on Mt. Sinai that surrounded Moses when receiving the Law, the clouds of the Son of Man in Dan 7:13, the cloud enveloping Jesus during his transfiguration, and now here with the return of Christ.
Jesus will literally “come down from heaven” (God’s space), not literally float down from cumulus clouds, but a hidden dimension altogether.
The purpose of the dead rising to “meet the Lord in the air” is to mix the metaphors (as it were) in presenting this picture of a divine king coming to his city and being paraded back (to earth in this case) by his people. It’s a beautiful image that ancient readers would have understood.
First and as per Matthew 24:29-31 and 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17, we read in Acts 1:9-11, The disciples are told by an angel that Jesus will return the way they saw him go and they literally saw Jesus go up and was hid by a literal cloud. This is literal. In the same way, Jesus must return literally in the same way as he left from Acts 1:9-11 which is exactly what Matthew 24:29-31 and 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17 tells us, Jesus' return to earth (not heaven) is in the clouds.
As per your idea of his people meeting "Jesus in the clouds" actually being his people just parading him back..... I can't spiritualize this like that. Better words could have been used that would have suggested what you believe, that the words used should have suggested his people gathering "on their own" and "in the land" rather than the clouds and as Matthew 24:31 tells us, it should not have said the angels would gather us. My first paragraph above helps to understand this, that it is Jesus literally returning to earth and his people as being gathered in the clouds by angels.
To add, there are too many signs that Jesus is to return in the clouds as per Matthew 24:29-31, 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17, and Acts 1:9-11 such as Jesus' return to Israel to fight the nations and the Mount Of Olives splits in Zechariah 14 (and Jesus restores the kingdom to Israel). I know you don't believe Israel is still chosen by God and I suppose you use that OT scripture from Joshua that says God fulfilled everything for the Jews. But a clear reading tells us this is as per the land (or Law Covenant) and not the Abrahamic Covenant. The Abrahamic Covenant is unconditional but the Law Covenant is conditional. What I am saying is that God fulfilled his part of the Law Covenant as God did give the Jews all the land that he promised. The Jews, however, failed to take possession of all the land and allowed some people to remain in parts of the land. Not just that but the promises in the Abrahamic Covenant are unconditional, the covenant is unilateral and is to be fulfilled by God, and these promises are to be everlasting. This "everlasting" part could not have been fulfilled back in Joshua's time because it could only be under the term "fulfilling" or "under fulfillment" as "everlasting" does not end. These are just a couple of reasons why Israel is still a people and nation before God. I can provide scriptures to back this position up. And not just that but are you familiar with Amos 9:14-15 (this was written after the statement that God had fulfilled everything for the Jew that we read in the book of Joshua), Amos 9:14-15 makes it clear that Israel will be a nation again and for "everlasting" this time. I believe this began in 1948 and I mentioned this previously to you and can again if you would like. Also a very important note back in the Joshua account, the Jews failed to take position of the land as it was conditional at that time on the Jews obedience, but as per the Abrahamic Covenant, it is all God and so where the Jews failed back in Joshua to take possession of all the land, Jesus (or God) will succeed at the Zechariah 14 account where the Lord Jesus (God) will do it himself and I doubt he will hesitate to take possession of all the land. Think about that, my friend. There are so many things that have happened in Israel as per prophecy fulfilment that one cannot overlook this.
Last edited: