Yep, want to see all of those back again. Also really want the show’s overall plot lines to start taking shape.Yes, I am ready for more Elrond and dwarves.
I even kind of missed Bronwyn and Theo last episode.
It is funny how much people let other things slide in comparison to this haha.I know that people complain about this show not being faithful, but I think it's as faithful any Hollywood adaptation have any right being. Until y'all see something on the scale of World War Z in terms of bastardization THEN we can talk lol.
It may seem odd on the surface, but if you think about it, the same would result from any beloved book. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that a book WWZ (I honestly didn't know such a thing existed) isn't as popular as Tolkien's mythology and doesn't have the following that The Lord of the Rings does. Hence, the (in varying degrees) outrage.It is funny how much people let other things slide in comparison to this haha.
It may seem odd on the surface, but if you think about it, the same would result from any beloved book. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that a book WWZ (I honestly didn't know such a thing existed) isn't as popular as Tolkien's mythology and doesn't have the following that The Lord of the Rings does. Hence, the (in varying degrees) outrage.
Let me give you an example. Suppose a movie were to be made about the Bible (we don't really have to suppose) that had Jesus (a carpenter by trade) helping Noah build some ark and having John the Baptist healing Job even though God was testing his faith. IMMA go out on a limb and say that wouldn't go over very well with a lot of people and they wouldn't be happy if the show runners said "Hey, it's too hard to do" or "Look, this is meant to be entertaining so we made some changes". In this "version" of the 2nd age, we have Celebrimbor as a contemporary of someone (Elendil) who was born well over a thousand years after his death and Sauron not even declaring himself when Elendil was an adult.
Frankly, I don't see why someone would get worked up over either. Just call it a Tolkien or Bible knockoff or What if or whatever and tell people if they don't like it, don't watch it.
It’s a simple point. There are books that are popular and people tend to take offense when the stories are jumbled beyond recognition. There was no comparison intended beyond that.Not entirely sure the Bible is the best example. Which version is Tolkien's version? How many books have been left out. Where do all the Abrahamic religions fall in? Hell, don't people like to compare this to a modern mythology? Let me tell you something about actual mythology. There ain't just one version.
At least that scenario still somewhat resembles the Bible. What happened to WWZ was wholesale bastardization lol.Let me give you an example. Suppose a movie were to be made about the Bible (we don't really have to suppose) that had Jesus (a carpenter by trade) helping Noah build some ark and having John the Baptist healing Job even though God was testing his faith. IMMA go out on a limb and say that wouldn't go over very well with a lot of people and they wouldn't be happy if the show runners said "Hey, it's too hard to do" or "Look, this is meant to be entertaining so we made some changes".
I did too, it gave me strong RPG vibes for some reason lol.As for the episode itself, I enjoyed it.
Yeah. I wouldn't know, but my point was a little different than that. The main point is that (I don't think anyway) WWZ is some beloved work of literature along the lines of LotR. What Hollywood does to certain writings is undeniable, but I was referring to the poster who said that people let other things slide in comparison to LotR and was trying to point out why there was a larger scale reaction to completely rewriting the events/timelines of the appendices relating to the 2nd age. A lot more people are familiar, and likely love, Tolkien's book than do fans of the WWZ book(s??).At least that scenario still somewhat resembles the Bible. What happened to WWZ was wholesale bastardization lol.
I assume spoilers, as it's a discussion thread for the episode.are these episode threads spoiler or no spoilers?
just checking, thanksI assume spoilers, as it's a discussion thread for the episode.
Same. I try to use spoiler tags myself, but don't trust others to do so.I assume spoilers, as it's a discussion thread for the episode.
It's not. I don't worry too much about it, though I wish they had just done this story with other names. I find it a little distracting when they put the name, for example, Galadriel on someone who was completely different soon after her arrival in Middle Earth in the 1st age (at the very latest). I mean, they aren't following the storyline and timeline of events (and often the events themselves) so I don't worry too much about the mischaracterization of the players.Another enjoyable episode. Things are slowly lining up. Elrond, Durin and Disa scenes are always great.
Galadriel is sadly the weakest link so far. It's not the performance, it is solely in her characterization. I get that the writers wanted to give her an arc, but they have gone too hard on the 'head-strong warrior woman' angle. It doesn't feel right for a character of her age and status.
Your spoiler is a good guess IMO.Adar mercy-killing the Orc was interesting. Are the showrunners running with the idea that orcs have souls?
The origin of the orcs and the reason for their inherently evil nature is something that Tolkien could never quite settle on, and it's still a topic of debate in the community. The Jackson films went with the idea that orcs used to be elves that had been tortured and corrupted by Morgoth. Tolkien had considered this possibility early on, but seemed to have completely abandoned it in his later years (he told Christopher point-blank "Orcs are not elves").
To make things even more complicated, Tolkien (being a Catholic) did not believe that souls could be "born" evil, nor did not believe that an entire race could be corrupted to such a point that evil becomes inherent to its nature. The simply work around to this is to make it so that orcs don't have souls. But then what are they? The Children of Ilúvatar (Elves and Men) have souls. The dwarves (Children of Aulë) were granted souls by Ilúvatar. So the orcs could not have been of these races.
In addition to this, Morgoth did not have the ability to create life (only corrupt it). But even if he had the ability to do so, it would have been exactly like what happened when Aulë first created the dwarves from stone. If Morgoth created the orcs from scratch, they would have essentially been automatons that were completely slave to his will. They would only be animated so long as Morgoth's thought and attention was upon them. But as we've seen in the books, orcs are capable of free will and often rebel against their masters or work in their own self interest. So Morgoth simply could not have created them like Aulë created the dwarves.
In my opinion, the most likely scenario is that orcs originally were some form of animal; like an ape. Morgoth captured them, and through his own evil devices he imbued them with higher knowledge, taught them speech, and re-shaped them physically to be mockeries of the Children of Ilúvatar.
Orcs/Origin
Sounds good to me, too.Adar mercy-killing the Orc was interesting. Are the showrunners running with the idea that orcs have souls?
The origin of the orcs and the reason for their inherently evil nature is something that Tolkien could never quite settle on, and it's still a topic of debate in the community. The Jackson films went with the idea that orcs used to be elves that had been tortured and corrupted by Morgoth. Tolkien had considered this possibility early on, but seemed to have completely abandoned it in his later years (he told Christopher point-blank "Orcs are not elves").
To make things even more complicated, Tolkien (being a Catholic) did not believe that souls could be "born" evil, nor did not believe that an entire race could be corrupted to such a point that evil becomes inherent to its nature. The simply work around to this is to make it so that orcs don't have souls. But then what are they? The Children of Ilúvatar (Elves and Men) have souls. The dwarves (Children of Aulë) were granted souls by Ilúvatar. So the orcs could not have been of these races.
In addition to this, Morgoth did not have the ability to create life (only corrupt it). But even if he had the ability to do so, it would have been exactly like what happened when Aulë first created the dwarves from stone. If Morgoth created the orcs from scratch, they would have essentially been automatons that were completely slave to his will. They would only be animated so long as Morgoth's thought and attention was upon them. But as we've seen in the books, orcs are capable of free will and often rebel against their masters or work in their own self interest. So Morgoth simply could not have created them like Aulë created the dwarves.
In my opinion, the most likely scenario is that orcs originally were some form of animal; like an ape. Morgoth captured them, and through his own evil devices he imbued them with higher knowledge, taught them speech, and re-shaped them physically to be mockeries of the Children of Ilúvatar.
Orcs/Origin