The Batman
The Dark Knight
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2002
- Messages
- 25,150
- Reaction score
- 3,229
- Points
- 103
dont be mad cause your thread stinks...
Well, this is probably going to sound bitter, but Ownage can't occur when the person making the comment is too dumbass to even understand what was said.ChrisBaleBatman said:Ownage by Aquaman
Style 92 said:Dusk. Beginning of night. Get a flipping dictionary.
Style 92 said:Well, this is probably going to sound bitter, but Ownage can't occur when the person making the comment is too dumbass to even understand what was said.
Besides, it's not like popular movies have never been renamed.
Star Wars became Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope, and Raiders of the Lost arc became Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Arc.
And go on, I dare someone to claim that Star Wars was always named "A New Hope" just because it was named that on the supposedly "unaltered" DVDs you bootlegged. It'll give me a good laugh, anyway.
Translation: "I just had my ownage completely revearsed back onto myself and I'm desparatly trying to retain the upper hand!" And with that, I'm off kiddies. Glad you took the thread more seriously than I did. Have fun flaming me!Aquaman said:Har-de-har. I'm not trying to be mean. I'm sorry if I've offended you. I'm just saying that I think that's a terrible idea.
"The Dark Knight Dusk" requires decyphering(not sure I spelled that right). There's nothing wrong with the word Begins. Or even having the movies carry different and unconnected titles.
With that logic, I assume you'd then want The Dark Knight eventually renamed: The Dark Knight Midnight. And the third film The Dark Knight Dawn.
No, i'm gonna watch, I'm just not gonna fight it.The Batman said:ah the old "I'm gonna leave so i dont see myself get owned again" post....nice....
This is just for The Batman's sake: I'm signing in to show I'm watching myself get flamed.The Fallen said:This is the most stupid idea i've read today. Why the hell rename a movie? That's damn silly.
Oh, I have. Just wanted to prove that I wasn't cutting and running, but I was paying attention.Aquaman said:You're not making yourself look any better. Forget about the fact that people didn't agree with you and get over it.
We're not patronizing you. We're patronizing your ideas. Everyone has stupid ideas.
Style 92 said:The Dark Knight Begins, or The Dark Knight Dusk, or something like that.
Because making the next one The Dark Knight is a really good idea. It's way of differentiating the new Nolan/Bale continuity from the old Burton Schumacker continuity. Think about it. Someone says Batman movie, you think the first four. Someone says Dark Knight movie, you think the new ones. Cool, huh?
So, Begins should be given a new title to bring it more inline with the new naming scheme, (because, frankly, the title is inline with the old naming scheme.)
mcflytrap said:That's idiotic.
THE DARK KNIGHT BEGINS
THE DARK KNIGHT
That sounds like a 4-year old came up with this.
Well, this is probably going to sound bitter, but Ownage can't occur when the person making the comment is too dumbass to even understand what was said.
Besides, it's not like popular movies have never been renamed.
Star Wars became Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope, and Raiders of the Lost arc became Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Arc.
And go on, I dare someone to claim that Star Wars was always named "A New Hope" just because it was named that on the supposedly "unaltered" DVDs you bootlegged. It'll give me a good laugh, anyway.
Style 92 said:Dusk. Beginning of night. Get a flipping dictionary.