• We experienced a brief downtime due to a Xenforo server configuration update. This was an attempt to limit bot traffic. They have rolled back and the site is now operating normally. Apologies for the inconvinience.

The Amazing Spider-Man Does a Lizard with no snout bother you? If so, why?

Why don't they use a puppet,have people move it,then in the editing room you erase the people moving it and speed up the footage.Then it would look real.
 
Why don't they use a puppet,have people move it,then in the editing room you erase the people moving it and speed up the footage.Then it would look real.

I'm imagining how ****ing hilarious that would look.
 
Why don't they use a puppet,have people move it,then in the editing room you erase the people moving it and speed up the footage.Then it would look real.

Looks good to me :woot:

lizard-sock-puppet-ideas-poster.jpg
 
This thread is hilarious...I guess that's what you get when you have the word SNOUT in your title.
 
©KAW;22007269 said:
This thread is hilarious...I guess that's what you get when you have the word SNOUT in your title.

Why the hell do you post here if all you do is ridicule the thread's very existence?
 
Since the face is very human-looking, there might be a way to enhance scaly makeup with a CGI tail and claws (a good example of CGI-enhanced puppetry is the goat thing in Pan's Labyrinth). In the end, though, this wouldn't work for the Lizard because it would severely limit what he could physically do. If he's jumping all the time, those shots would pretty much require a CGI version, and it would look inconsistent with the other version, so it would be easier and more economical to just make him entirely CGI.
 
I meant with a animotronic puppet,not a sock puppet lol.
 
I'd have to agree that looking at this picture of what the Lizard will officially look like:

lizard3tn.jpg


that it not only doesn't look remotely terrifying, but that it looks more like something you would see on a TNG Star Trek episode. And speaking of Star Trek, I actually find THIS to be a far more ferocious and monstrous looking half-man/half-reptilian creature that what the Lizard will look like in what's supposed to big-budget Hollywood movie even though it's clearly a guy in an rubber suit circa 1966:

StarTrek-Gorn.jpg
 
I'd have to agree that looking at this picture of what the Lizard will officially look like:

lizard3tn.jpg


that it not only doesn't look remotely terrifying, but that it looks more like something you would see on a TNG Star Trek episode. And speaking of Star Trek, I actually find THIS to be a far more ferocious and monstrous looking half-man/half-reptilian creature that what the Lizard will look like in what's supposed to big-budget Hollywood movie even though it's clearly a guy in an rubber suit circa 1966:

StarTrek-Gorn.jpg
That Lizard pic is an early concept. Not the final look.
 
The only part I don't like is the face. The body looks great. The face is just TOO human IMO. It needs to look more beastly. Oh well, maybe I'll get used to it.
 
It looks great to me, but the whole thing could easily be ruined by cartoony CGI. It's essential that they go as realistic as possible.
This is always my concern when it comes to Sony Imageworks.
 
have no fear, RIM saw the finished lizard in the russian movie expo and he said that it looks "awesome" and "very real"
 
I've heard. Sony needs to let us see it. Bring forth that new trailer...and stick a Lizard in it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
200,620
Messages
21,774,244
Members
45,610
Latest member
picamon
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"