I liked the movie overall. What I'm saying below are nitpicks that didn't take away from the film, but are still things I didn't really like.
- I didn't really like the use of the mid credits scene.
- I liked SLJ in this movie and I really liked him and Larson together. But I think Dan Murrell on SJ said it best and I'm paraphrasing "SLJ's portrayal of Fury works well in this movie, but not in the franchise as a whole." They come off as 2 completely different people. And of course I know this is in the past, around 10-13 years before we meet him in the Iron Man stinger. But I think it would've been better if they started pushing him toward his colder Phase 1 and Phase 2 portrayal. Like it's so jarring to me to see him in CM and then the next day when I watched TWS. Again I know time passes, but they could've at least hinted at this. Or even that he would become the director of SHIELD. Honestly...this can all be fixed by a Nick Fury movie imo. I'm still down for that if SLJ is. Set it in between CM and IM. I'm not a fan of prequels, but I think part of what a prequel should do is kinda hint or show how a character changes. I mean this is a bad prequel example, but if in Attack of the Clones Anakin was a happy boy and all of the sudden in Revenge of the Sith he's so full of anger it would've been jarring. I just wanted to see hints of Fury being smart and ahead of the pack like he is in the rest of his portrayals.
- The retcons/plot holes were pretty bad. Again they didn't take away from my enjoyment of the movie, but they did leave me with a lot of questions. The biggest one, that a lot of people have been asking...why the **** didn't Fury call Carol during the Battle of New York or The Battle of Sokovia. And I know I've seen all the MCU fanboys defenses.
1) Those events weren't important enough. I'm sorry but that one is just stupid. I'm not trying to be rude, but that's really stupid. A freaking giant portal that is allowing an alien race to come through kill, capture, and destroy or a whole city lifting in the sky isn't important enough to call for help when you have it? No that's silly. Hell, I'd even say when Thor showed up he should've called her. It's kinda like how it's stupid that none of the sorcerers, who are supposed to be Earth's protectors, showed up for any major event like the Battle of New York or Sokovia
2) Maybe he tried and she didn't come. That could be it I guess we have to see what happens when Fury and Carol meet in Endgame. Fury: "Where have you been?" that could be interesting. Maybe he holds some resentment.
Speaking of Thor in Avengers, Fury claims they started preparing for higher warfare because of the Asgardians. Why weren't they doing that when the Skrull and the Kree showed up? It's not like it was a secret that Fury hid from SHIELD. It seems like he wrote a report on it.
Yes, I know the real life reason: Marvel, very understandably, didn't think that far ahead. But it seems very careless and frankly lazy that they didn't try to make things line up. Like they know where this story ends up, I feel like if they weren't lazy they could've made things line up fine. Retconning just seems weird with a live action movie, especially when it's not that needed.
There is one thing that's not a nitpick that actually kinda bothered me with Captain Marvel"
- Carol didn't really have a great character moment. The MCU gets by a lot by being "fun" and having great characters. And most if not all of the best characters (or at least best received one) have great moments that sum up everything you need to know about the character. And I'm not just talking about a great action scene or display of power. Like Iron Man showing up in The Avengers blasting AC/DC, Spider-Man lifting up the rubble, etc. And very true we can get one in the future, but even within first movies we should be getting great moments like Star Lord's introduction dancing and getting the orb, Steve diving on the grenade, the "I Am Iron Man" press conference.
I don't feel like we got that from Carol in this movie. In fact I feel like you can go through the best and worst MCU movies and the worst ones are the ones without great, non action, characters moments. Carol really needed on to show who she is. The best we got was that hokey standing back up montage, but it didn't feel earned or even good. I mean for example in Cap 1 there's something similar. Steve stands up for what is right to the guy who's disrespecting the WWII soldiers. Next scene, Steve is getting the brakes beaten off him by the guy who is literally like twice Steve's size. But he's still getting back up and saying "I can do this all day." Carol's moment didn't really have that greatness. And we really need that moment especially if she's meant to be the leader of the Avengers moving forward. Come to think of it, I'd argue we haven't gotten that moment from Dr. Strange or Black Panther either. Not saying those characters are bad, but there is now "I can this all day" scene. There's no "I Am Iron Man" scene.
Here's a thread for any questions you might have about the movie. Also, for things you liked or disliked about the film.
This thread is full of spoilers, but they don't have to be tagged here.
Here are a few of mine. I'll think of more later.
Questions:
1. Is there something that's meant to be sexist about telling someone to smile?
Things I disliked:
1. I would've preferred Carol's call sign was "Warbird" instead of "Avenger". Why did they have to give her that name just so Fury could name his initiative after her?
Things I liked
1. Goose the cat was fun. I liked when he was hanging on when the plane took off, or when he was floating in zero gravity. Also when the Kree declared him a major threat.
-I'm a man who admittedly has RBF and have been told to smile, usually by women. and I didn't know it happened to women until about 4-5 years ago when a then girlfriend told me. I always just thought it was a very rude thing to say. But all the women I've spoken to do say it is seen as a form of sexual harassment.
-About Carol's call sign: I actually really liked that. The "Avengers" name never made sense until Endgame. There is nothing they've been avenging. They should've been called The Defenders. Tony has the clunky line about "If we can't save the world we'll avenge it or whatever" but it didn't fit. It doesn't hurt the movie/the MCU or whatever that they are called the Avengers, but I did like they did that with CM
-See to me, I didn't mind the cat. But it felt really really really low denominator type stuff. What does the internet like? Cats. Let's give it to them. And specifically that moment you mentioned was really lame to me. An animal reaction shot is very low imo
I like the beginning of the movie but I think the reason for some it's meh is that scene where the skrulls are going through carols memories kind of grinds the movie to a halt. That scene goes on a bit too long imo. Felt jarring first time I saw it.
Very much agree with that