A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
lol it's getting mainstream now
the vibe on earth in 2021 is certainly different to 2017
Ya we're seeing smoke, not quite the fire yet
Jason Kilar just tweeted, the army has bombarded him with toxic polite requests
WB: let's screenshot the 5 idiots and tell Variety
The way I look at it, if you count yourself among those who want to see Snyder's DC-verse continue, there are two main factors that need to line up before that happens.
1. Shared Interest. Assuming that Zack is willing to follow his vision through to completion, where does the rest of the original cast and crew stand on this? Ben, in particular, has a tendency to be indecisive about such matters, so there's no telling what he would want to do. Cavill is still involved with legal crap and the like. So, it goes w/o saying that he'd need to have all that crap sorted out, the sooner the better. Fisher's Cyborg, who arguably serves as the heart and soul of Snyder's JL, is likely done with Warner for the foreseeable future. Then there are other cast members. Would Amy Adams be interested in reprising her role as Lois? Let's say she's unable to return due to a scheduling conflict or what have you. Would people be okay with the role getting recast? I know some folks are fine with someone like Hamm replacing Ben, but what about Superman? If Henry can't come back, what then? I know everyone wants the original cast members to come back (ahem, most of them anyway, as I could probably live with Eisenberg getting replaced), but if we're being realistic, some of them won't be able to make it.
2. Viewership Metrics. When all the necessary data has been tabulated and examined by the finance guys at AT&T, how will those numbers translate as relates to new HBO Max subscribers? We already know that "the Cut" debuted with a fairly impressive performance, but the question remains. Just how massive was it? And will that be sufficient incentive for WB to invest even more money into potential sequels?
For me personally, it'd be a little weird to see this universe continue without heavy hitters like Affleck, Cavill and Gadot; Amy too. I mean, if we were on the cusp of getting something entirely new with a different director/creative team, that'd be different; but with Snyder involved, I'd want the overall experience to feel as familiar as possible. And having the main cast members on-board would go a long way toward getting that. Point being, that in the event of this not happening, I'd have to grin and bear it. And I suspect I wouldn't be the only one in that boat. lol
As for WarnerMedia, it won't be long before they have all of the relevant data in front of them. How they choose to act on this is, of course, beyond our control. So, we just have to wait it out a little and hope for the best, clichéd as that may sound.
The ONLY scene I liked that was added was when Bruce said that Superman was more human than he was. “The world needs Superman, and the team needs Clark.”I thought the Snyder Cut was significantly better than the Whedon Cut... The only Whedon scene I kind of missed was the opening Batman/Parademon scene. Almost all the other Whedon stuff that was removed was crap, just removing it made the movie better. I thought the Barry/Iris/Dog walker scene was awful but other than that I think the majority of what was added in the SC made the overall movie better and more developed.
But man, Snyder really does love throwing people into walls and leaving blood splatter behind. Happens quite a few times in this movie and happens a couple times in BvS too. And obviously he went full force with the slow-mo again, which gets tiresome after the first few times. I like Snyder overall but he definitely needs to refine alot of things.
Steppenwolf was much better, both in looks and dialogue/characterization. One nitpick, I wish the line "No protectors here, no Lanterns, no Kryptonian, this world will fall, like all the others" was directed at the League rather than a throw-away line in conversation with Desaad. In the original trailer that line hit harder, because I thought he would be threatening the League.
I think the Snyder Cut is a pretty solid movie, not without it's flaws but much, much better than the theatrical cut. I still like Man of Steel the most of the Snyderverse movies but this cut definitely made this the second best movie of the trilogy. Eisenlex ruins BvS.
That said, despite the fact I actually like Snyder, to an extent, and this movie washed some of that bad taste away from Whedon's cut, I'm not really interested in seeing the Snyderverse continue. One of my least favorite parts of this Trilogy was the Knightmare sequences, and the leaked storylines and ideas Snyder had for the sequels just aren't things I want to see.
What was the tweet?
The ONLY scene I liked that was added was when Bruce said that Superman was more human than he was. “The world needs Superman, and the team needs Clark.”
Fists vs bullets. How is that a good comparison?It's funny that people are annoy by how violent Batman was in BvS and it disgusts them.
On the other hand, they see trailer for The Batman with Pattinson in which he constantly beating up a teenage gang member, and they are pleased. For them, it's the real Batman right there.
Fists vs bullets. How is that a good comparison?
I think Snyder looked at the previous films and thought "Batman kills people a lot."
He then proceeding to have Batman kill people.
I think the same can be said for the destruction in MOS. Look at for example, the DCAU, in his fights with Captain Marvel and Darkseid, Superman is knocking them through buildings.
In the first Justice League episodes the tridpods wipe out a huge portion of Metropolis.
I think Snyder looked at this and just went with it.
Snyder didn't invent this stuff.
Offensive
I don't get what his tweet means
It's different in live action, I suppose. As you said, part of Metropolis was wiped out in JLTAS, but it doesn't come off as damaging as the battle in MOS. Zack also goes out of his way to make it more visceral - showing us the blood (WW fight scene in JL).
I thought the Snyder Cut was significantly better than the Whedon Cut... The only Whedon scene I kind of missed was the opening Batman/Parademon scene. Almost all the other Whedon stuff that was removed was crap, just removing it made the movie better. I thought the Barry/Iris/Dog walker scene was awful but other than that I think the majority of what was added in the SC made the overall movie better and more developed.
But man, Snyder really does love throwing people into walls and leaving blood splatter behind. Happens quite a few times in this movie and happens a couple times in BvS too. And obviously he went full force with the slow-mo again, which gets tiresome after the first few times. I like Snyder overall but he definitely needs to refine alot of things.
Steppenwolf was much better, both in looks and dialogue/characterization. One nitpick, I wish the line "No protectors here, no Lanterns, no Kryptonian, this world will fall, like all the others" was directed at the League rather than a throw-away line in conversation with Desaad. In the original trailer that line hit harder, because I thought he would be threatening the League.
I think the Snyder Cut is a pretty solid movie, not without it's flaws but much, much better than the theatrical cut. I still like Man of Steel the most of the Snyderverse movies but this cut definitely made this the second best movie of the trilogy. Eisenlex ruins BvS.
That said, despite the fact I actually like Snyder, to an extent, and this movie washed some of that bad taste away from Whedon's cut, I'm not really interested in seeing the Snyderverse continue. One of my least favorite parts of this Trilogy was the Knightmare sequences, and the leaked storylines and ideas Snyder had for the sequels just aren't things I want to see.
Whats that Kilar tweet implying?