I don't know who that is.
There are no examples of circular logic in that post.
That's not how enjoying or critiquing movies works.
For starters, what constitutes a plus or a minus is at least half subjective. Additionally, enjoyment or critique of a film doesn't come down to basic math. Movies aren't a basic math equation where you tally up the good and the bad and see what you have more of at the end. Movies are complex and organic entities, and watching a movie is an intensely personal experience. You can have 98% "good" elements, but that "bad" 2% completely taints everything else and causes the whole structure to collapse. Conversely, you can have 98% "bad" elements, but have 2% of "good" elements that are so strong or are executed in just the right way that it completely elevates the piece. Also, "goodness" and "badness" is not a simple binary state. It's a huge shifting four dimensional spectrum, with a huge swath of "meh" in the middle. One could argue, in fact, that most "bad" movies are not truly bad, simply banal to an extent that most viewers are not willing to tolerate.
And again, like I said, it is possible to genuinely enjoy a movie and still think that the studio made a mistake, because you think the other path they could have gone down would have resulted in an even better movie. People feel that way about movies all the time. Heck, I feel that way about The Winter Soldier and Age of Ultron. I love both films, but I see where Marvel could have made them even better, and I do wish that had happened.
To say that any rational person would look at the outcome of this film and see it as a positive is an extremely reductive view of the moviegoing experience.
EDIT: Also, I just looked up Sylvia Plath, and I really don't see what a pro to-feminist 20th century American poet has to do with what I wrote in that post, unless it's a reference to the thematic nature of her poetry and I'm not seeing the connection.
