We hear the bones from within Connors shifting, to accommodate muscle mass and bone growth, which slowly reveals his second arm forming and a tail forming down his spine.
You see, that's the kind of discusting stuff I want on film. I just want everything within The Lizard's transformation to gross some people out. If you think about it, growing an arm and a tail connected to your flesh requires some pretty nasty stuff.Byrne shows Connors taking the regenerative formula, going to bed, then waking up in the middle of the night with a tiny withered arm growing out of his shoulder stump.
Now that's a question I would love an interviewer to ask Raimi, why do you always kill the villains at the end, why not have them ALL live?Well If Raimi returns, I doubt that Lizard will survive unless he has a second villain to kill off.
I'll take this opportunity to restate a somewhat controversial opinion of mine --- I don't think that Dr. Connors should be cured at the end of the hypothetical movie. At least not all the way.
To avoid comparisons with the Hulk and to add a slightly increased level of realism to the Lizard character, the initial transformation from Connors to Lizard should be shown to take place over an extended period of time. How this would be shown would depend on the structure of the film of course but Connors' transformation could take place in the background while the focus is on a secondary villain or storyline, or the whole transformation process could be shown as a flashback after the Lizard is already on the loose. Since the physiological changes that happen during the mutation from man to lizard-man are so extensive, the Lizard should not transform to and from human form during the film. He could just get more and more lizard-like as the plot progresses, perhaps starting out as the intelligent talking Lizard and ending up as the savage beastial Lizard.
When we finally get to the "cure," whether it be something whipped up by Spider-Man or something taken from Connors' lab, it can have a partial effect in the Lizard, perhaps restoring the mind of Dr. Connors. What a poignant tragedy to have the mind of Connors still trapped in the monstrous body of the Lizard. Thus we could see the unfortunate Doctor taken away to some kind of secret government holding facility (how about The Vault?) and even though the Lizard doesn't get killed, the ending is still downbeat in classic Spidey style.
An alternative to this would be to show Connors in captivity slowly turning back to human form. Maybe show him looking human, but with rough skin and no hair as he slowly turns back and waits for a chance to be with his family again.
That's the way I would do it at least.
If the plot focuses on another villain during the transformation, who do you want it to be?
Absolutely NOT.I want to see Spidey fighting more street-thug criminal types, so I'd like to see some members of the "Maggia", as they were called in the comics. Regular hoods like Silvermane, Cicero or Hammerhead, and maybe one super-powered thug like Tombstone to make things interesting. Thus, there are actually no costumed supervillains in SM4, just the Lizard and the Maggia guys. If there needs to be a link established between the plotlines, there could be some kind of situation similar to Amazing Spider-Man #74-76, where Curt Connors' family is kidnapped by crooks for some reason and the Lizard takes time out from his rampage to tear up a few Mafia boys.
Good way to show Peter's scientific knowledge and abilities.
Absolutely NOT.
That would be...The Lizard Meets The GoodFellas. I dare not go into my~what works in the comics, doesn't always work on screen. But that would be the case here.
What people should understand is, when it comes to The Lizard, because he's an animalistic character, you can't mix but so many concepts in terms of other villain(s) with him. You can't really have The Lizard being a fully thinking creature, that's what Connors is for. On screen, even Connors' family should be in danger when he's around them. No King Kong type thing, where he'll kill any human, but won't kill his lady love. This brings some dramatic and heart felt situations to the story at hand. A man who loves his family, but is also terrified of being around them, namely because he'll leave them a pile of shreaded flesh. This isn't the HULK, where Connors knows that he doesn't kill, so he knows that The Lizard doesn't kill. This would also fall into the character of the comics not liking HUMANS.
The wrong combination would take away from Connors/The Lizard and not let his character/story evolve. This is why I'm scared that they'll choose the wrong combination.
Here are my only choices for SM4 with THE LIZARD as the main villain:
1) There's only THE LIZARD, no secondary villain. Just Spider-Man vs. The Lizard.
2) KRAVEN THE HUNTER, the combination of the Lizard, Spidey and Kraven, would literally give way to the character development all three characters simultaneously.
For featured characters, I would include Maxwell Dillon (ELECTRO) but no ELECTRO the super-powered villain. Just MAXWELL DILLON. Also, this would be the movie, that the public finds out that DOCTOR OCTOPUS may not be dead, a sighting perhaps written in the Daily Bugle. I wouldn't mind just seeing those tentacles moving about at the end of the film, no full body shown, just those beloved tentacles. Lights on!
Personally, I think the Lizard/Kraven combination would be a great fourth movie.
Now that's a question I would love an interviewer to ask Raimi, why do you always kill the villains at the end, why not have them ALL live?
Now that's a question I would love an interviewer to ask Raimi, why do you always kill the villains at the end, why not have them ALL live?
For featured characters, I would include Maxwell Dillon (ELECTRO) but no ELECTRO the super-powered villain. Just MAXWELL DILLON. .
Absolutely NOT.
That would be...The Lizard Meets The GoodFellas. I dare not go into my~what works in the comics, doesn't always work on screen. But that would be the case here.
What people should understand is, when it comes to The Lizard, because he's an animalistic character, you can't mix but so many concepts in terms of other villain(s) with him. You can't really have The Lizard being a fully thinking creature, that's what Connors is for. On screen, even Connors' family should be in danger when he's around them. No King Kong type thing, where he'll kill any human, but won't kill his lady love. This brings some dramatic and heart felt situations to the story at hand. A man who loves his family, but is also terrified of being around them, namely because he'll leave them a pile of shreaded flesh. This isn't the HULK, where Connors knows that he doesn't kill, so he knows that The Lizard doesn't kill. This would also fall into the character of the comics not liking HUMANS.
The wrong combination would take away from Connors/The Lizard and not let his character/story evolve. This is why I'm scared that they'll choose the wrong combination.
Here are my only choices for SM4 with THE LIZARD as the main villain:
1) There's only THE LIZARD, no secondary villain. Just Spider-Man vs. The Lizard.
2) KRAVEN THE HUNTER, the combination of the Lizard, Spidey and Kraven, would literally give way to the character development all three characters simultaneously.
For featured characters, I would include Maxwell Dillon (ELECTRO) but no ELECTRO the super-powered villain. Just MAXWELL DILLON. Also, this would be the movie, that the public finds out that DOCTOR OCTOPUS may not be dead, a sighting perhaps written in the Daily Bugle. I wouldn't mind just seeing those tentacles moving about at the end of the film, no full body shown, just those beloved tentacles. Lights on!
Personally, I think the Lizard/Kraven combination would be a great fourth movie.
Well Vis, I'm glad you want to see Lizzy in SM4, and I agree that the Lizard by himself is the best scenario possible.
However, I think some of your visions for the Lizard are a bit too close to the horror movie genre with respect to him tearing everyone to pieces and theatening his family and such. The Silver-age Lizard was indeed too merciful, while the 1990s Lizard was too savage. I think there's a balance to be found somewhere in between. Particularly if Lizzy is the ONLY villain in the film and remains in Lizard-form most of that time, he can't be a rampaging killer the whole time.
My reasoning with the Maggia (and there certainly doesn't have to be any link between the Maggia and the Lizard in the storyline), is that there needs to be more Spidey vs crooks action that doesn't involve super villains. The scene in SM1 where Spidey stops the bank robbers in the street was great, classic Spidey stuff. Lots of real-world acrobatics and action, not so much CGI. This is the kind of stuff I want to see more of in a Spidey movie. I want to see Spidey infiltrate a mob boss's HQ and battle his way past dozens of thugs with automatic weapons. Tombstone is a good back-up here to keep things from getting too one-sided in Spidey's favor, but he should just be a minor character overall. Thus we don't need any origin stories (except maybe a throwaway line explaining Tombstone's powers), or JJJ coming up with villain names or costumed villains. Just Spidey cleaning up the streets of NY before he has to tangle with the Lizard.
Also, regarding a Kraven/Lizard combination in SM4 -- this was just recently done as a storyline in the SM3 video game, so the chances of that happening onscreen might be greatly reduced now.