The Amazing Spider-Man The Mary Jane Watson Thread

[chaseter]

MEW for MJ...that is all.

 

[dark_b]

its actually not hard to look sexy. but if you are skinny and on drugs and .......

meeeeeh

 

[Sentinel X]

well at least we have evan rachel wood for mary jane in the spider-man musical. me-ouch !

Oh man!!
I remember her from the movie thirteen (a good indie film btw)....wow, she really grew up. She looks good now and I wouldnt mind her for Mary Jane (I really want to watch the Spider-man musical, it could be cool. I wonder how theyd do Dr.Ock)


I don't think Kirsten Dunst is ugly per say...I just think she looks average and if you're an average looking girl and you're cast as Mary jane you have to work a little extra hard to do justice to your role and Kirsten Dunst doesn't seem to try at all. Its like she knows she looks like a hot mess...and she doesn't care

 

[ross2287]

If Kirsten comes back I just hope she has red hair, not orange hair.

 

[SP1D3RxV3N0M]

well at least we have evan rachel wood for mary jane in the spider-man musical. me-ouch !

That's what I call "Good casting".

 

[Catman]

That's what I call "Good casting".

That's what I call, "flat chested."

 

[Crook]

And MEW is....?

 

[sPiDeRmAn2o29]

And MEW is....?

lmfao very good point !

 

[Dragon]

Mary Elizabeth Winstead. No I don't know who she is but there's a thread nominating her for MJ.

 

[NewYorkSpider]

Mary Elizabeth Winstead. No I don't know who she is but there's a thread nominating her for MJ.

She was the girl in Live Free Or Die Hard. John McClane's daughter. She would make a perfect MJ.

 

[FaT_tONle]

That's what I call "Good casting".

I gotto check out this Spiderman musical...

 

[SP1D3RxV3N0M]

That's what I call, "flat chested."

Have you seen the actress playing MJ this days?

 

[Sentinel X]

That's what I call, "flat chested."

True....but she is still leagues better than Kirsten "sagging granny boobs" Dunst. .

I still say Mary Elizabeth Winstead is the perfect Mary Jane (look-wise)...her acting is kind of bad though, Evan Rachael Wood is a better actress so....?

Ill be happy when they get rid of Dunst. Im now convinced anyone can do better than her.

 

[sPiDeRmAn2o29]

Raimi Lets Go Some More Spidey 4 News

Who is Peter Parker? Is the director interested in the return of Kirsten Dunst? What will the tone of Spider-Man 4 be? All these questions are at least touched on by the Webslinger's director.
Whether you believe in the hype or not, people are hammering for any Spider-Man 4 movie news. With rumors running around that Kirsten Dunst will not return for the 4th installment to Bruce Campbell playing a fan favorite villain in Mystero, Sam Raimi sheds a little light on what actually is happening and puts some speculation to rest.

Raimi does not seem to be looking to mold Spider-Man 4 from the success of TDK. Instead Raimi wants to delve deeper into the character that is Peter Parker. Raimi goes on to say: "I hope we don't react to these very good and sometimes bad superhero movies around us. I hope that we just take ever deeper into the truth of who Peter Parker really is," Raimi said. "As a human being and the unique character, and that we celebrate that, which is a lot of the reason I want to make this next picture. I still believe I have an understanding of Peter Parker as the character that I have not quite put onto the screen yet."

Truth be told Spider-Man 4 would not be as good of a movie as it could be if the entire tone of it was dark. The dark tone worked for TDK because that's what Batman is. Spidey is a smart mouthed, wisecracking crime fighter. We need to see more of that in Spider-Man 4. Spider-Man basically is the most annoying New Yorker you know that could web you up and make you feel bad about it at the same time.

According to Raimi if screenwriter David Lindsay-Abaire delivers a dark, edgy toned script then that's the kind of movie Raimi will make, if the screenplay goes into a different direction then that's what Raimi will follow. One thing is for sure, fans do not want a wishy washy Spider-Man any more. We have seen what happens to a emotional wreck that has super powers, lets move on. Time for a solid Spider-Man movie with at the most 2 villains that are properly introduced on screen without making it look like one or the other should not be there.

Raimi goes on to say that soon he will be meeting with Kirsten Dunst about reprising her role as Mary Jane. Sam Raimi and Star Toby Mcguire have signed the dotted line for Spider-Man 4, no such luck for Ms. Dunst.

 

[sPiDeRmAn2o29]

She was the girl in Live Free Or Die Hard. John McClane's daughter. She would make a perfect MJ.

lets not forget the sexy ass cheerleader in death proof oh and she was also in sky high.

 

[sPiDeRmAn2o29]

Have you seen the actress playing MJ this days?

yeah she is looking really horrible these days.... she hasnt been signed on yet for the fourth which could be both good news and bad news... good news is that I heard she isnt interested in acting anymore and could be replaced... bad news.. she hasnt done a good film since spider-man 3 lol so this could be her come back or as we would all say CRAP back.

 

[sPiDeRmAn2o29]

True....but she is still leagues better than Kirsten "sagging granny boobs" Dunst. .

I still say Mary Elizabeth Winstead is the perfect Mary Jane (look-wise)...her acting is kind of bad though, Evan Rachael Wood is a better actress so....?

Ill be happy when they get rid of Dunst. Im now convinced anyone can do better than her.

well evan rachel wood is a better actress but she is already casted to play mj in the musical so I HIGHLY doubt that sony would get her to play in the fourth and fifth film. All you have left is mary winstead and I really think that she can pull it off. Of at least get a really good actress with red hair this time lol. I would go with alicia witt who was sam raimi's first choice but, I am not sure that would work out at all.

 

[sPiDeRmAn2o29]

opps... that picture kinda came out way too big sorry ! ! !

 

[venom892]

Raimi Lets Go Some More Spidey 4 News

Who is Peter Parker? Is the director interested in the return of Kirsten Dunst? What will the tone of Spider-Man 4 be? All these questions are at least touched on by the Webslinger's director.
Whether you believe in the hype or not, people are hammering for any Spider-Man 4 movie news. With rumors running around that Kirsten Dunst will not return for the 4th installment to Bruce Campbell playing a fan favorite villain in Mystero, Sam Raimi sheds a little light on what actually is happening and puts some speculation to rest.

Raimi does not seem to be looking to mold Spider-Man 4 from the success of TDK. Instead Raimi wants to delve deeper into the character that is Peter Parker. Raimi goes on to say: "I hope we don't react to these very good and sometimes bad superhero movies around us. I hope that we just take ever deeper into the truth of who Peter Parker really is," Raimi said. "As a human being and the unique character, and that we celebrate that, which is a lot of the reason I want to make this next picture. I still believe I have an understanding of Peter Parker as the character that I have not quite put onto the screen yet."

Truth be told Spider-Man 4 would not be as good of a movie as it could be if the entire tone of it was dark. The dark tone worked for TDK because that's what Batman is. Spidey is a smart mouthed, wisecracking crime fighter. We need to see more of that in Spider-Man 4. Spider-Man basically is the most annoying New Yorker you know that could web you up and make you feel bad about it at the same time.

According to Raimi if screenwriter David Lindsay-Abaire delivers a dark, edgy toned script then that's the kind of movie Raimi will make, if the screenplay goes into a different direction then that's what Raimi will follow. One thing is for sure, fans do not want a wishy washy Spider-Man any more. We have seen what happens to a emotional wreck that has super powers, lets move on. Time for a solid Spider-Man movie with at the most 2 villains that are properly introduced on screen without making it look like one or the other should not be there.

Raimi goes on to say that soon he will be meeting with Kirsten Dunst about reprising her role as Mary Jane. Sam Raimi and Star Toby Mcguire have signed the dotted line for Spider-Man 4, no such luck for Ms. Dunst.

I'm crossing my fingers for no Dunst.

 

[sPiDeRmAn2o29]

I'm crossing my fingers for no Dunst.

same here and much as she is a sweet heart, she just didnt seem to really care that much in the third film. her acting was really bland... I think with all of the bad press she is getting with her character in the third film she might not even return. The odds are really looking good towards her returning though with sam and tobey coming back. I am just crossing my fingers on this one !

 

[sPiDeRmAn2o29]

Kirsten Dunst's Spider-Man 4 Warning

Kirsten Dunst believes 'Spider-Man 4' will be a flop if she and Tobey Maguire don't star in it.

The actress - who plays Mary Jane Watson, the love interest of the superhero's alter-ego Peter Parker, in the hit movie series - insists any attempt to continue the franchise without her, Tobey - who plays the web-slinger - and director Sam Raimi would be a box-office disaster.

"Audiences aren't stupid. It'd be a big flop without me, Tobey or Sam."

She added: "That would really not be the smartest move. But they already know that."

Dunst and Maguire have both distanced themselves from a fourth movie, with the pair admitting they would like to pursue other roles.

Maguire said: "I feel like this film is kind of a natural conclusion to a lot of stuff that's happened in the first two movies. It kind of feels like a natural trilogy. I'm not going to make more just because they've been successful."

 

[sPiDeRmAn2o29]

this is what kirsten dunst looks like now, this was taken in New York City in Feb of this year just incase anyone was wondering what she looks like nowadays...

 

[Adrian89]

Kirsten Dunst's Spider-Man 4 Warning

Kirsten Dunst believes 'Spider-Man 4' will be a flop if she and Tobey Maguire don't star in it.

"Audiences aren't stupid. It'd be a big flop without me, Tobey or Sam."

What a stupid afirmation. Maybe it's available only for the brainless fans who can't see Spider-Man without this crew and then when they get a new crew, which would also do a good job or even better, all the fans are gonna be happy and can't imagine better without the new one.

She added: "That would really not be the smartest move. But they already know that."

Casting you in the first place wasn't the smartest move my dear Kirsten!

Maguire said: "I feel like this film is kind of a natural conclusion to a lot of stuff that's happened in the first two movies. It kind of feels like a natural trilogy. I'm not going to make more just because they've been successful."

No, he will do it for money though. And it's true, because he will be in SM4.

this is what kirsten dunst looks like now, this was taken in New York City in Feb of this year just incase anyone was wondering what she looks like nowadays...

Doesn't matter. Nowadays they can hide everything with the help of computers. Sad indeed.

 

[LightningFlash]

Raimi does not seem to be looking to mold Spider-Man 4 from the success of TDK. Instead Raimi wants to delve deeper into the character that is Peter Parker. Raimi goes on to say: "I hope we don't react to these very good and sometimes bad superhero movies around us. I hope that we just take ever deeper into the truth of who Peter Parker really is," Raimi said. "As a human being and the unique character, and that we celebrate that, which is a lot of the reason I want to make this next picture. I still believe I have an understanding of Peter Parker as the character that I have not quite put onto the screen yet."

He doesn't want to mention how bad Spider-Man 3 sucked, haha.

"Audiences aren't stupid. It'd be a big flop without me, Tobey or Sam."

She added: "That would really not be the smartest move. But they already know that."

You're right Kirsten, audiences aren't stupid. That's why they weren't watching the movie just to see you, they were watching it because it's about SPIDER-MAN.

If we lose you, it won't be a drastic loss.

Actually, it'll be a big gain.

 

[Dragon]

opps... that picture kinda came out way too big sorry ! ! !

Yeah, dude. You should really resize it. It's a pain loading this page because of that ginormous pic of someone who's not going to be in the film in the first place.