K
KaineMorrison
Guest
What are you talking about?
Carlie
A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
What are you talking about?
Yeah, I really enjoyed this one as well. Very nice to see Ron Frenz & Sal Buscema again, brought a nice air of authenticity to this long-awaited Ock/Goblin tale. From what is shown, parts are taking place after Invasion of The Spider Slayers, during Maximum Carnage, and the ending places itself right before Spider-Man Unlimited #3. Another fine deed for Norman...
I'm going to guess that Liz dies, forcing Harry to come back to NYC to care for Normie. Should be interesting to see how Normie get's along with little Stanley.
Slott promised us that a long time character could die and no "old timer" has bit the dust. Liz has been around since AF 15, it doesn't get any more long term than that.
Will #31 have a higher page count?
diedCarlie
diedCarlie
I thought they were referring to the events in Annual #2...
Oh I didn't read that. You may be right then.
Okay, I did a review of this at the Crawlspace, and I got to be honest: while I thought there were some good, and even brilliant moments in this issue,I was profoundly disappointed in the way and manner in which Peter gets his body back from Otto to say the least.
And let me pose you folks this question: are we really 100% sure that Peter Parker is indeed back? Because if you really look closely at this issue, it's not as clear-cut as we might think because we have two alternatives: either the Otto Octavious we've been reading about since Amazing Spider-Man #698 was really just a brainwashed Peter having been reprogrammed into believing he was Doc Ock, which also means the real Doc Ock died in Amazing Spider-Man #700...or, because as this issue reminds us, Ghost Peter is just a "memory fragment" of Peter, which means the real Peter is still very much dead and it was only the "memory fragment" who took control of Peter's body and that he only thinks he's the real Peter.
And BTW, I'm inclined to agree that the scene with Liz Allan was a definite red herring designed to throw us off the real Goblin King: Lil' Normie Osborn. Just look at that scene again and pay particular attention to what Normie says.
I've been saying it for a while now:Okay, I did a review of this at the Crawlspace, and I got to be honest: while I thought there were some good, and even brilliant moments in this issue,I was profoundly disappointed in the way and manner in which Peter gets his body back from Otto to say the least.
And let me pose you folks this question: are we really 100% sure that Peter Parker is indeed back? Because if you really look closely at this issue, it's not as clear-cut as we might think because we have two alternatives: either the Otto Octavious we've been reading about since Amazing Spider-Man #698 was really just a brainwashed Peter having been reprogrammed into believing he was Doc Ock, which also means the real Doc Ock died in Amazing Spider-Man #700...or, because as this issue reminds us, Ghost Peter is just a "memory fragment" of Peter, which means the real Peter is still very much dead and it was only the "memory fragment" who took control of Peter's body and that he only thinks he's the real Peter.
And BTW, I'm inclined to agree that the scene with Liz Allan was a definite red herring designed to throw us off the real Goblin King: Lil' Normie Osborn. Just look at that scene again and pay particular attention to what Normie says.
I'll probably get flamed for this but that thing I wanted to get a closer look at......
The big splash page when Peter gets back all of his memories, I admit, I was scouring that for the wedding scene. I was hoping maybe they would sneak it in there so if Peter remembered it, then the door would ever so slightly be open for the future. I know, I know.....oh, well.
Okay, I did a review of this at the Crawlspace, and I got to be honest: while I thought there were some good, and even brilliant moments in this issue,I was profoundly disappointed in the way and manner in which Peter gets his body back from Otto to say the least.
And let me pose you folks this question: are we really 100% sure that Peter Parker is indeed back? Because if you really look closely at this issue, it's not as clear-cut as we might think because we have two alternatives: either the Otto Octavious we've been reading about since Amazing Spider-Man #698 was really just a brainwashed Peter having been reprogrammed into believing he was Doc Ock, which also means the real Doc Ock died in Amazing Spider-Man #700...or, because as this issue reminds us, Ghost Peter is just a "memory fragment" of Peter, which means the real Peter is still very much dead and it was only the "memory fragment" who took control of Peter's body and that he only thinks he's the real Peter.
And BTW, I'm inclined to agree that the scene with Liz Allan was a definite red herring designed to throw us off the real Goblin King: Lil' Normie Osborn. Just look at that scene again and pay particular attention to what Normie says.
You're not the only one! The thought did cross my mind when I was looking at all the scenes, especially when they said ALL the memories.
Oh well, indeed...
This is what I had brought in my earlier post, which was in Spoiler tags. I mean, didn't Slott say before that "Ghost Pete" was a memory fragment and not real Pete? So what does this mean?