BlackLantern
Eternal
- Joined
- May 19, 2007
- Messages
- 77,148
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
still waiting
A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
i always liked hand-less rick. for one it shows that he's not impervious to damage just because he's basically the main character, and two because before that he is pretty much always the fearless leader, and he really starts to doubt his abilities when he only has one hand and cant help the group as much. but overall? yeah, i wouldnt mind if they skipped it in the show. as long as the sense of real danger is still there.If it means a shorter prison section, yes, it's definitely for the best. The comic's been great but nowhere near perfect, so the greater creative freedom of adapting the concept as a whole rather than the specific comic stories will allow Kirkman and Darabont to iron out some of those unsightly kinks that are forever stuck in the comic.
Personally, I'm wondering if Rick will lose a hand in the show. Kirkman was saying he regretted taking Rick's hand off within a couple months in the letters page because, unlike in superhero comics, if a character loses a limb in TWD, it's gone for good. I doubt Rick will lose the hand in the show. Kirkman's experience with how much having one hand limits the character's options plus either 1) the cost of special effects to convincingly remove the actor's hand in every episode after he loses it or 2) the cheap look of just hiding the character's hand in bandages or a sleeve will make Kirkman nix that idea for the show.
I'd prefer that he to lose the hand, since like Corp said it did something interesting for the character but it won't bother me if they decide to keep it on.
Anyone have any idea how violent they can make this thing?
Newsarama's got the entire first issue of The Walking Dead up for free, by the way.