charl_huntress
Avenger
- Joined
- May 20, 2006
- Messages
- 10,888
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 58
Kane said:I dislike that idea. I dont like adding new characters to Clark's Smallville origins. It should go back to simply Clark, Pete and Lana (Smallville's big three)....Pete was his friend/rival and Lana was his best friend/girl next door. Chloe and Lex are unnecessary.
Don't get me wrong. I don't want to see Chloe Sullivan in the comics at all. However, it doesn't make sense to buy a character who's origins begin in Smallville, and then change it so she doesn't come from Smallville. What's the big deal about adding more characters to the SV crew in the comics. I mean, Clark had more friends and enemies in Smallville. Braveman came out of nowhere, so who is to say that she was just one of the people he knew. I disagree that Smallville should be restricted to just the Kents, Lana and Pete. Though, I do agree that Lex should never have been there. That's a stupid SA aspect Smallville the show should worked around. There are plenty of reasons for Lex to be in Kansas, but not so many IMO why him and Clark would be friends.
Kane said:Helena B is still alive, I'm sure she will continue for some time. Its not like the baby could become Huntress....not for a loooooooong time.
I'd love to see the comics stick with this timeline, watch the characters grow older...and then evolve to that point.
See, the only problem I have with this is letting the characters grow older means they actually have to get older. I want them to stay perpetually young. Children have to age, so unless the character are young in their own right than they will get old. I don't want to see Lois Lane die of old age, unless she comes back youthful like Supes. I aslo don't want to see a gray-haired Supes, or a Supes without his accompanying cast, ie. Perry, Jimmy, etc. So, the baby is problematic in that if you have one it has to age...eventually. At this point, I'm saying wait for the baby until he can be aged to match the perpetual youth. At this point, Clark and Lois are in the mid thirties...I think...or maybe early thirties. But if they had a kid, by the time he was 15 they would be fifty or something. I'm not down with that.
Kane said:One of the problems with Earth 2 was they had alot of timeline gaps, we missed alot showing the characters growing up.
Now that IC has focused the DCU on a core group of characters, singular versions of them....we can watch them grow for the next 2 decades or more....in possibly real time.
As I said earlier, I'm not a fan of real time growth. I don't really like to read about old comic book heroes unless it's an elseworld. They child has to grow so they can all stay youthful. For instance, Nightwing was Robin, but Bruce is still young enough to be Batman indefinitely...that's the type of timeline that appeals to me when it comes to character aging.