Citizen_Kaine
Sidekick
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2004
- Messages
- 2,676
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
stillanerd said:Agreed. (Besides, Araña fits that bill already )
BTW, newsflash to those of you who are hard-core Ben Reilly fans and who are eager for him to return: It's not going to happen. If anything, Kaine will probably come back long before Ben Reilly ever does. Plus, if Spidey was cloned AGAIN it doesn't mean that clone would be Ben Reilly; it would just be another carbon copy of Peter with his memories, NOT Ben Reilly's, who himself had memories that he himself never experienced either.
And yes, while I liked Ben Reilly as well simply because of the "little brother/cousin" angle that was played, here's the dirty little secret:
The only reason why Ben Reilly was popular was because he was how Peter Parker should've been written had the writers of the Clone Saga actually wrote Spider-Man in character instead of being so hell-bent on replacing him. In short, Ben Reilly fans are closet Peter Parker fans. (*stillanerd now braces for the impending and inevitable beatdown from Citizen Kaine and all of his CWO buddies and he calls upon the powers of the dark side )
*Comes out of the shadows and snaps "Nerds neck*
Heres the question though, did it take the creation of Ben Reilly to see all what that wrong with the Spider Titles?
Wasn't Peter being written as an idiot and a sap long before the "mystery man" ever appeared? Didn't Peter and MJ spend less time being a family and more time fighting and *****ing, long before the words Scarlet Spider were ever concieved? How about the supporting cast, they did alot... In regards to standing around and making Peter's life miserable.
Peter Parker as a sociopath did not sell, the writers found that out long before Spec 216 ever hit the stands. All of the above statements occured long before the whole saga was drawn up. Peter Parker was not written like this to sell others on the character on Ben Reilly, Ben Reilly was created because the writers had written Peter into a ditch. And yes while Ben was created to replace Peter as well, it was done in order to avoid any conflicts of interest that would have happened if Peter Parker had reverted to his old fun loving self, examples.
1. There is no more Peter Parker supporting cast: Answer, find him a new job/location and introduce him to the characters:
Problem, The Daily Bugle is a key element of the cast, a new job takes him away from that (See ASM V2 30 on)
2. The Peter Parker relationships were a key element of the old Spider Man stories: Answer have him find a new female protagonist and build upon that (Yeah I know, I'm channeling the ghost of Joey Q here )
Problem, Everyone likes Mary Jane, shes now a key aspect to the mythos, she can never be replaced.
and so forth
By creating Ben Reilly, the whole Peter Parker/Mary Jane mythos that we all know and love stay the same and we get a whole new Spider Man to play and grow with, and as an added bonus we get the Classic Spidey and his red headed ball and chain annnnnnnnd his daughter as supporting cast members. Lots of possible growth and opportunity to use, and the classic Spidey feel that everyone reads in the Essentials and loves!
Instead of all that we get mystical totem Spidey hanging with his boss Iron Man at the New Avengers tower with ****ing Aunt May baking wheatcakes for Wolverine as comic relief
So yeah I'm a closet Peter Parker fan. Privy to how Peter Parker should be written, whether his name be that or not.