Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]457833[/split]
I don't get why people are giving her so much ****. She is spot on, the movie side has done nothing to help the show at all which defeats the purpose of the idea of the MCU concept.
I don't get why people are giving her so much ****. She is spot on, the movie side has done nothing to help the show at all which defeats the purpose of the idea of the MCU concept.
Yep, I totally agree with her I don't see why people are giving her crap.
I think people are giving her $*** because she sounds a bit entitled and bratty. Marvel cinema doesn't owe her anything.
She hasn't considered the logistic, creative, contractual and financial nightmare associated with adding a random AoS cast member to a Marvel movie?
It would be hard to insert an AoS crossover without it feeling awkward and forced. If there lucky they might get to feature in one of the infinity war films, but whatever the IW screen writer puts together might conflict with whatever plot line is on the show. If Fitz and Simmons are written into Infinity War, but Fitz dies in AoS then there going to have to make adjustments.
Civil War screen writers have talked about how much of a nightmare it was to adjust the script because they had to add Spiderman last minute.
It's not as easy as it sounds.
I agree. Again, is there any video or audio of this? Because I doubt she said all this in an overly negative way. It's weird how everyone looks at this as if she's trying to be greedy or big headed. Of course she wants to be a part of the MCU films, of course she'd like to see her character interact with other heroes. Hell, a lot of fans would including me. I think everyone is just making mountains out of peanuts.I don't get why people are giving her so much ****. She is spot on, the movie side has done nothing to help the show at all which defeats the purpose of the idea of the MCU concept.
It's Marvel having their cake and eating it too. I'm also conflicted on whether Coulson should have remained dead or not. On the one hand the death is major turning point for the Avengers and undoing it invalidates the meaning and sacrifice to it. On the other hand, Coulson is an awesome character and Clark Gregg is great.The whole Avengers still thinking Coulson is dead stuff is stupid and should have been cleared u ages ago, and I don't see why the likes Cap, Natasha and Hawkeye wouldn't be able to reference is in some fashion in the movies.
I am certain that if Clark Gregg had made the same comments he wouldn't be getting this backlash.
I agree. Again, is there any video or audio of this? Because I doubt she said all this in an overly negative way. It's weird how everyone looks at this as if she's trying to be greedy or big headed. Of course she wants to be a part of the MCU films, of course she'd like to see her character interact with other heroes. Hell, a lot of fans would including me. I think everyone is just making mountains out of peanuts.
hey it not suppose to be easy! That's why them writers are paid the big bucks. A crossover don't mean you got to add one of the AOS characters in the movie. Just refer to something in the show. To tell you the truth what the writers wrote in Civil War was weak! They could of mention inhumans. Hey how bout the ATCU? The president running that organization. Civil War would have had a bigger better story!I think people are giving her $*** because she sounds a bit entitled and bratty. Marvel cinema doesn't owe her anything.
She hasn't considered the logistic, creative, contractual and financial nightmare associated with adding a random AoS cast member to a Marvel movie?
It would be hard to insert an AoS crossover without it feeling awkward and forced. If there lucky they might get to feature in one of the infinity war films, but whatever the IW screen writer puts together might conflict with whatever plot line is on the show. If Fitz and Simmons are written into Infinity War, but Fitz dies in AoS then there going to have to make adjustments.
Civil War screen writers have talked about how much of a nightmare it was to adjust the script because they had to add Spiderman last minute.
It's not as easy as it sounds.
I am certain that if Clark Gregg had made the same comments he wouldn't be getting this backlash.
She doesn't sound any of those things and didn't say one of the AoS characters should appear in a movie, she was saying that SHIELD should be acknowledged within the movies.
hey it not suppose to be easy! That's why them writers are paid the big bucks. A crossover don't mean you got to add one of the AOS characters in the movie. Just refer to something in the show. To tell you the truth what the writers wrote in Civil War was weak! They could of mention inhumans. Hey how bout the ATCU? The president running that organization. Civil War would have had a bigger better story!
Screen writing for movie's does not work like that. The civil war script was finished way before season 3 even started. Sure you can do reshoots, but Marvel are not going to waste time and money on adding a few words just for pointless fan service. An inhumans name drop isn't going to improve the script. In fact it will confuse most people in then audience that don't watch the show.
this is the problem - calendars
if the entire movie script was know and the entire AoS season scripts were know. Then there would be opportunities to shoot scenes at the end of the movie that tied the tv series to the movie
But the calendars do not align (among other things)
Hey you are a straight Chloe Hater! She said they should reference the show. SHE never said her. Tell you the truth is never was a Quake Fan but she did her thing this yearKevin Feige and Ike Perlmutter hate each other. It isn't happening.
Also, Chloe kind of sucks as a thespian. The show itself is mediocre, at best. If any shows are ever getting acknowledged by the movies, it's going to be the Netflix shows and even that is a long shot.
Chloe wants to be in the movies, when she took the role someone probably told her if the show was a success, she might be promoted to the movies. Well, the show's ratings suck, it's moving to the death slot. The Inhumans movie has been shelved. And Feige and Perlmutter split.
Maybe the world revolves around Princess Daisy (how many better characters have died for her while she behaves like a brat?), but it doesn't revolve around Chloe Bennet.
Hey you are a straight Chloe Hater! She said they should reference the show. SHE never said her. Tell you the truth is never was a Quake Fan but she did her thing this year
If you stop hating and pay attention to her character progress, you will see that Chloe made Quake a diverse great character. You probably never watch the show, you probably just look at the ratings. Honestly I don't know any better female hero character on TV better than Daisy Johnson.
Kevin Feige and Ike Perlmutter hate each other.
Honestly I don't know any better female hero character on TV better than Daisy Johnson.