MessiahDecoy123
Psychological Anarchist
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2008
- Messages
- 24,867
- Reaction score
- 3,554
- Points
- 103
Is this a chess move ahead of Trump losing?
Will Trump supporters rally behind Russia?
Will Trump supporters rally behind Russia?
Russia really has been out of control.
Obama has been completely ineffectual in checking them.
Russia still acts like it's the 60's. I question Putin's resolve. In a conventional war, the United States would mop the floor with Russia.
Certainly they still have a formidable nuclear arsenal, but would they actually use it because of a proxy war in Syria?
Russia is flexing its military muscle as tensions with the US simmer in the wake of a heated third presidential debate, where Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton called Republican candidate Donald Trump a puppet for Russian President Vladimir Putin. Now, Russia has declassified the first image of its new thermonuclear intercontinental ballistic missile.
The RS-28 Sarmat missilebetter known as the Satan 2 nuclear missilehas finally been revealed after years of being hyped by the Russian government. According to a Russian publication aligned with the Kremlin called Sputnik, the super-nuke has a payload capable of destroying an area the size of Texas.
The new weapon can deploy warheads of 40 megatons, or about 2,000 times as powerful as the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagaski in 1945.
Former assistant secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy Dr. Paul Craig Roberts called the atomic bombs that Washington dropped on Japan popguns compared to todays thermo-nuclear weapons. One Russian SS-18 wipes out three-fourths of New York state for thousands of years, he said in a blog post. Five or six of these Satans as they are known by the US military, and the East Coast of the United States disappears.
To make it even more frightening, the Satan 2 is also capable of evading radar defenses and could travel far enough to strike the US East and West Coast.
The picture of the rocket was published today by chief designers at Makeyev Rocket Design Bureau. Along with photos of the rocket, the designers included the following statement (roughly translated by Google Translate).
In accordance with the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation: On the state defense order for 2010 and the planning period 2012-2013. JSC SRC Makeyev instructed to begin the development of OCD Sarmat. In June 2011, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation signed a state contract for OCD Sarmat. Prospective strategic missile systems (RKSN) Sarmat is created in order to secure and effective nuclear deterrent tasks of Russias strategic forces.
This rough translation can give you at least some insight into how long the engineers have been working on this missile, and it shouldnt be a surprise to anyone who has been following the US-Russia relations. In 2013, Russian announced it would begin deploying a new type of long-range missile to replace its Cold War standby, the original Satan missile. The Satan 2 missile realization of the deployment.
The original Satan missile was developed in the 1970s, as the Soviet Union achieved nuclear parity with the US in the wake of the Cold War. Those missiles are now approaching the end of their service lives. US and Russia both signed treaties in 2010 restricting the number of intercontinental ballistic missiles the countries would keep in reserve, but despite the truce, Russia said it must maintain a strong nuclear deterrent because of the US military involvement in Europe. The Satan 2 will be put into service in late 2018, and Russian officials say it will fully replace the old Satan missiles by 2020.
Russias decision to suddenly reveal the new missile is especially troubling as tensions between the country and US are flaring up over hacking allegations and conflict in Syria. While we dont expect any immediate military conflicts with our NATO allies, it is certainly upsetting to know that people are actually spending time building such catastrophic weapons.
If we left Putin and Assad alone, would they leave us alone?
The thing is, if we wanted to, we could bring Russia to its knees quicker than Putin could say, Stalin. They are nowhere near as powerful as the once were (it's debatable if they ever really were) but the USA could shut them down so quick they wouldn't even know what happened to them. If we were to launch a coordinated cyber-attack coupled with strategic strikes on key compounds it would be over in less time than the first Iraq war.
Granted this would cause WW3 most likely so it's not an advisable scenario but the point remains.
What? Are you off your meds young one?
There's nothing that the US and ALL its allies haven't done in concert to bring down Russia (short of direct military attack) that they haven't done already.
a) Sectoral financial sanctions
b) Partially engineer an oil-price collapse
c) Color Revolution in the Ukraine
d) Proxy War in the Donbass
e) Immense & unprecedented propaganda campaign
f) NATO build-up
g) EU trying every stupid energy policy imaginable so that purchases of Russian natural gas are minimized.
h) Pushing Turkey (and Ukraine) as NATO's vanguard against Russia.
i) Trying to reignite the Chechen conflict.
j) Pushing Azerbaijan to attack Armenia
k) Trying to lure Belarus away from Russia
l) Threatening all Central Asian -stans with destabilization via Jihadi proxies.
m) Encouraging Jihadis to attack Russian targets anywhere.
n) Bringing down of Russian civilian airliner (allegedly by terrorists) over Egypt, then have the British FM publicly state: "Putin should take this as a warning"
o) Asking from India to break-off relations with Russia (and just google the Indian PM's reply to this Western demand)
p) Endless provocations and attempts at escalation on both the Syrian & Ukrainian fronts.
q) Frequent usage of naval & aerial military assets all over Russia's vast periphery.
r) Daily threats by Western officials on all levels.
s) Many other things that I am now forgetting.
Guess what my friend, Russia when united internally, is exactly the wrong country to be messing with. The entire western world and all their slavish pooches will be reminded of this stark lesson in the coming years. The most perceptive in the West have already realized: http://observer.com/2016/10/syrias-civil-war-is-over-russia-won/
I take it that you are quite light on history, the military capabilities of Russia, geopolitics as well as the long-tern prospects for the global energy industry (since you are obviously only being informed by outlets such as CNN & The Guardian. Since this is the case, you should refrain from silly statements such as those made above.
Depends on by what you mean when you say "alone". Putin doesn't like that we build strategic missile defense bases on our NATO allies soil in Europe. He sees that as a threat to Russia (it kind of is but only if he starts flexing) whereas our allies see it as the only thing keeping Russia from pulling stunts like he did in the Ukraine.
When it comes to Assad that is just a huge clusterf***. Assad is committing war crimes against his own people and is buddy/buddy with Putin. We look kind of stupid there because Obama drew a line in the sand about chemical weapons, Assad called that bluff and crossed that line then Obama didn't do anything. I understand Obama's hesitancy to not get our troops involved in another ground war with no foreseeable end and the American people def don't want that.
Geopolitical matters are always complicated af and I'm sure there is many more nuanced things I'm missing in my description but that's the gist of it. Putin wants to be able to throw his weight around without anyone throwing much back and our EU NATO allies really like it when we keep that kind of behavior in check.
I see we have our first Russian state agent of propaganda here on the Hype. Half the list you have up there is plain old nonsense. We aren't in the 1800-1900's anymore champ. Nobody has to try and fight a ground war with Russia during the winter. All we would have to do is launch a coordinated cyber-attack in conjunction with drone and air strikes and it's a wrap for Russia. Why do you think Putin has been pissed at us for so long? Because we've littered Europe with missile defense capabilities to keep his ass in check. I'm ex-military and am quite well versed in what we are capable of doing so bring your BS Russian propaganda elsewhere.
What? Are you off your meds young one?
There's nothing that the US and ALL its allies haven't done in concert to bring down Russia (short of direct military attack) that they haven't done already.
a) Sectoral financial sanctions
b) Partially engineer an oil-price collapse
c) Color Revolution in the Ukraine
d) Proxy War in the Donbass
e) Immense & unprecedented propaganda campaign
f) NATO build-up
g) EU trying every stupid energy policy imaginable so that purchases of Russian natural gas are minimized.
h) Pushing Turkey (and Ukraine) as NATO's vanguard against Russia.
i) Trying to reignite the Chechen conflict.
j) Pushing Azerbaijan to attack Armenia
k) Trying to lure Belarus away from Russia
l) Threatening all Central Asian -stans with destabilization via Jihadi proxies.
m) Encouraging Jihadis to attack Russian targets anywhere.
n) Bringing down of Russian civilian airliner (allegedly by terrorists) over Egypt, then have the British FM publicly state: "Putin should take this as a warning"
o) Asking from India to break-off relations with Russia (and just google the Indian PM's reply to this Western demand)
p) Endless provocations and attempts at escalation on both the Syrian & Ukrainian fronts.
q) Frequent usage of naval & aerial military assets all over Russia's vast periphery.
r) Daily threats by Western officials on all levels.
s) Many other things that I am now forgetting.
Guess what my friend, Russia when united internally, is exactly the wrong country to be messing with. The entire western world and all their slavish pooches will be reminded of this stark lesson in the coming years. The most perceptive in the West have already realized: http://observer.com/2016/10/syrias-civil-war-is-over-russia-won/
I take it that you are quite light on history, the military capabilities of Russia, geopolitics as well as the long-tern prospects for the global energy industry (since you are obviously only being informed by outlets such as CNN & The Guardian. Since this is the case, you should refrain from silly statements such as those made above.
Why don't you do it then?
Yes, you are missing things like context, you show no grasp of what the confrontation is all about, who exactly the proxies are, the difference between Ukraine and countries that are not half-Russian, the sequence of events, the concept of false flags etc etc...
Assad is killing his own people? So you think that Putin & Assad & Iran have nothing better to do but kill random unarmed Syrian civilians? To be sure, civilians always get caught in the crossfire, but how did the great democratic alliance of NATO put it so many years ago? Collateral damage if I'm not mistaken. Or do you think that when NATO warplanes drop bombs only "evildoers" die?
Why don't you do it then?
The U.S and others called for Assad to step aside.Take out Assad?
How many of those conflicts are outdated remnants of the cold war with the Soviet Union?
How much of it was the direct result of recent Russian aggression?
Just curious how much Putin pays people like you to spread nonsense like this on the internet? Hopefully, a box of Russia's finest vodka is included in there for you be able to wash it all down.
Haha comrade, you've got it twisted. I'm ex-military and don't have any say so of who we attack. The Russian military has damn fine men serving it they were just unlucky enough to get stuck with horribly outdated equipment and a government that would rather spend their money building nukes like the one I posted above instead of investing in its fellow countrymen and infrastructure. Make no doubt about it, we could bring Russi down to nothing without ever stepping foot on their soil.
War should be avoided if possible.
The U.S and others called for Assad to step aside.
A state sanctioned assassination or capture of a foreign leader without a large scale UN or global consensus would open an entire different can of worms. We need to look no further than Gaddafi's toppling in Libya or Saddam in Iraq. Atleast we had the common sense to let actual Libyans and Iraqis do the dirty work of offing them. In the U.S bombed Assad in Damascus it would only create more anti-U.S sentiment amongst many in the region and make things continuously unstable.
BBC Newsnight interviewed some Russians the other night for their views on the country politically. It was pretty interesting.
The Russians said many Russians feared political change as it has often coincided with catastrophe and unrest in Russia. People are scared of what will happen once Putin leaves because he is a autocrat that controls the country in some ways more singularly than during the Soviet Russian Communist era and there isn't really anyone to fill his place.
Mush of Putin's foreign policy to project strength and cover up flaws and failings back home in Russia. Putin has also fostered a us against them mentality with Russians convincing some the West is out to weaken Russia and wants to see them fail. They like Putin as they feel he stands up to foreigner detractors and he has tried to restore Russian patriotism which took a dip in the nineties.
War should be avoided if possible.