KalMart
239-Bean Irish Chili
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2005
- Messages
- 16,732
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 58
If their is no other logical explanation for the Bible other then it is the True word of God (which is my theory), then a sound scientific explanation doesn't matter.
This is a major fallacy in considering ANY scripture as a default explanation, and again, it was written before the ability to scientifically understand these things was even developed. Today, rationally and practically, the alleged 'word of God' does not explain how these things happen, it only offers an excuse for not asking. Evolution, and science in general on the other hand, does.
A sound scientific explanation certainly does matter...because we know better now and require things for science and knowledge. If one proposes religion as an 'answer' to this, there remains an immense burden of provability on it. This just isn't its game, sorry.
Firstly, it can't be. Secondly, it still wouldn't disprove evolution...it doesn't disprove that fossils exist, or that they can be dated to many millions of years back, or that mutations in species can be witnessed and analyzed, or that distances of millions of light years can be calculated and determined. That is here...now...and real...right in front of us. It won't suddenly disappear from sight and memory if some author, mortal or otherwise, is somehow identified. So sorry, but that's a pretty glaring error of thinking on your part. What you're after is misdirection, not proof.Because if it can be proven that God gave the Bible, then evolution must not be true, because the Bible says it's not.
Last edited: