JtheDreamer
Slangin Grannys Peach Tea
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2015
- Messages
- 4,290
- Reaction score
- 427
- Points
- 73
That is the most ridiculous 'restatement' of another person's argument I've ever seen.
Nothing is more ridiculous than you smothering this thread with your expectations.
No. She doesn't have to remain antagonistic to the very last second of the movie regardless of what happens. She should show a gradual change away from her heavy antagonism as she comes to see things in a different light. Or at the very least have a clear epiphany moment that explains why the change is so unbelievably sudden. Her just generally thinking 'Yeah, this guy isn't as bad as I thought he was' really doesn't cut it when it comes to explaining such a passionate person making a complete 180 on such an important subject.
Why should she show "gradual" change? You do realize this is an action-CBM with just under a 2 hour run time and on up until Scott Lang was victorious, there was no reason to be a believer.
Again, this has nothing to do with anything missing from the movie. It's a personal preference of yours. Major life-changing events like the one that transpired at the end of the movie is indeed enough to change a person's mind.