Gothamsknight
A Dark Knight
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2016
- Messages
- 16,427
- Reaction score
- 28,728
- Points
- 103
I think one of those have been posted, but not all of them.
totally, Nolan's world seemed so grounded in a, no so much boring way.... but like, it felt like it was trying too hard to look normal, but then you had two face, and it got kinda weird... like, a lot of it, for me, didn't feel organic normal. Like Bane, they made it very realistic, but at the same time, it felt very surreal - joker, scarecrow etcIt’s crazy to think about TDK, and really that whole trilogy, in relation to the film we’re about to receive.
Both have had the words “grounded” and “realism” applied to them and yet (and, granted, just based on one short trailer) the outcome of each film feels so different.
totally, Nolan's world seemed so grounded in a, no so much boring way.... but like, it felt like it was trying too hard to look normal, but then you had two face, and it got kinda weird... like, a lot of it, for me, didn't feel organic normal. Like Bane, they made it very realistic, but at the same time, it felt very surreal - joker, scarecrow etc
This version looks organic, that's all I can say.
Batman meets Se7en meets The Crow sounds like pure heroin to me.I know some people are going to be dismissive and angry about this being Batman meets Se7en. But, I’ll take that anyday.
I mean...I wouldn’t say it’s more realistic. It’s more detail oriented. There is a focus on the granular aspects of the world. While Nolan’s films were more sweeping and epic. Reeve’s world is stylized. That’s why it’s raining 24/7. That’s not real. It’s evoking a style.
I mean...
1. We don't know if in Reeve's world it's really "raining 24/7". From what we saw of the funeral scene, the press conference scene and the shots of Selina going to the graveyard it's not raining there.
2. There are places in real life where it constantly rains.
I think the difference is this:
Nolan's Gotham is meant to juxtapose larger than life characters against a city that feels like a world we recognize. It's meant to contrast those things. IE Richard Donner's Superman.
Reeve's approach, while darker and more 'realistic' on the surface, seems to be going back to the Burton approach of crafting a fictional city and aesthetic for Batman and the rogues to be in harmony with. IE it's stylized in the same way a movie like Se7en is.
In that way it could almost be seen as a synthesis of all that's come before.
I keep forgetting that Andy Serkis is in this. It's weird that we haven't seen any image of Alfred yet.
We may not have seen him, but unlike a good half of the cast, we have heard him.I keep forgetting that Andy Serkis is in this. It's weird that we haven't seen any image of Alfred yet.
It can and it should.
I think the difference is this:
Nolan's Gotham is meant to juxtapose larger than life characters against a city that feels like a world we recognize. It's meant to contrast those things. IE Richard Donner's Superman.
Reeve's approach, while darker and more 'realistic' on the surface, seems to be going back to the Burton approach of crafting a fictional city and aesthetic for Batman and the rogues to be in harmony with. IE it's stylized in the same way a movie like Se7en is.
In that way it could almost be seen as a synthesis of all that's come before.
I can tell ya, raining 24/7 can be very real...I wouldn’t say it’s more realistic. It’s more detail oriented. There is a focus on the granular aspects of the world. While Nolan’s films were more sweeping and epic. Reeve’s world is stylized. That’s why it’s raining 24/7. That’s not real. It’s evoking a style.
totally.. our mind, when we look at Gotham, if we lived there... we would assume it's like Reeve's world, when in reality, it's Nolan's.Just because it looks more gothic and nightmarish than Nolan’s Gotham, doesn’t mean it’s less realistic. If anything is more stylistic it’s the cinematography. You’d be surprised by how creepy certain corners of the world are.