DigificWriter
Superhero
- Joined
- May 4, 2002
- Messages
- 7,692
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 31
^ I don't think it's likely.
Putting a production company or studio logo on a movie isn't about promotion, though, which is why it's highly unlikely that MS will have their specific logo attached to this movie.
Putting a production company or studio logo on a movie isn't about promotion, though, which is why it's highly unlikely that MS will have their specific logo attached to this movie.
why did you take dylan o'brien out of your sig????I'd say they're definitely steering the wheel. Marvel is just telling them where to go, typical back seat drivers.
People still fail to realize that the 2017 Spider-Man movie is a SONY movie that Marvel is helping out with. They're not just going to fork up a ton of cash and let Marvel call 100% of the shots. They're going to strongly consider their suggestions considering how well the MCU is doing in comparison to Sony's previous universe. However, final creative control is what it is, and it lies in Sony's hands.
Putting a production company or studio logo on a movie isn't about promotion, though, which is why it's highly unlikely that MS will have their specific logo attached to this movie.
Without starting an argument, I'd like to bring up the Forgotten Realms universe as an example of what i believe Feige's use of the phrase "Sony Universe" more than likely means.
For anyone who isn't familiar with it, the Forgotten Realms is a shared universe subsetting within the Dungeons and Dragons roleplaying franchise. In addition to comprising sourcebooks and other roleplaying matetials, the Forgotten Realms subsetting has been adapted into other various forms of media, with the largest chunk of that adaptation coming in the form of various novels written by a variety of disparate authors and featuring a wide variety of different characters, many of whom are under the propriety comtrol of a specific author and/associated with a particular location or geographic region, and it is not uncommon for a particular author or authors to be referred to as having their own "universe" within the wider Forgotten Realms subsetting, which is exactly the kind of scenario I believe Feige was referring to through his use of the phrase "Sony Universe".
To answer harryoscop's question about Marvel Studios and Sony sharing or not sharing characters beyond Spider-Man himself, I get the sense that it's not entirely out of the question, but isn't something that is automatically guaranteed or that should be expected.
I am bumping this thread because of all the new stuff Kevin Feige has said recently. First off, if someone could kindly post it all because I'm behind on it and secondly - I read that kingpin won't be in the reboot - does that mean sony indeed does not have the power to use marvel characters?
okay, so what exactly does it mean? because yes although daredevil is television, the kingpin is his own character and is a rogue of spiderman's...having him be the main villain of the first film is the perfect way to kickoff the new series imoNot necessarily, just that Feige doesn't want to use him. I think it's more movie vs. tv than anything else.
okay, so what exactly does it mean? because yes although daredevil is television, the kingpin is his own character and is a rogue of spiderman's...having him be the main villain of the first film is the perfect way to kickoff the new series imo
Well, I wouldn't call it reusing him, I'd say it's continuing the narrative of the mcu as far as kingpin's story arc goes. Also, I get that feige isn't into daredevil and has very little to do with that property, but that isn't a reason for him to ignore kingpin for that reason. just like how even though the mcu is one big franchise, each individual superhero still helms their own franchise within it as well. spiderman included, so kingpin being a rogue of his should be a reason to have him in a film and him being in a televised series shouldn't be to discount them.What it means is Feige disagrees about it being the perfect way to kick off the new series. Keep in mind as of a month ago, he said he hadn't even seen Daredevil yet. Connectivity from the TV side of things isn't a priority. So, while yes, Kingpin is absolutely a Spider-Man foe, I don't think reusing the character from Daredevil is his priority.
Plus, we don't know what's going to happen in season two of Daredevil. For all we know, he dies.
However, the good news is that, in my opinion, there's nothing in his comments that says they aren't allowed to use him. Just that Feige doesn't want to at the moment.
Well, I wouldn't call it reusing him, I'd say it's continuing the narrative of the mcu as far as kingpin's story arc goes. Also, I get that feige isn't into daredevil and has very little to do with that property, but that isn't a reason for him to ignore kingpin for that reason. just like how even though the mcu is one big franchise, each individual superhero still helms their own franchise within it as well. spiderman included, so kingpin being a rogue of his should be a reason to have him in a film and him being in a televised series shouldn't be to discount them.
also, killing kingpin off before any encounters with spiderman...
lastly, I wish it was more clear about what sony can and can't do. it still doesn't seem 100% clear to me. I think this thread should get stickied