skix said:4th bad guy = spiderman symbiote
Gamma Ray said:Sin City, comic book film perfection,
TheFuture said:This villain will supposedly cause "mass hysteria". So it won't be a cameo villain at the start. I simply believe there is not a 4th villain. The 4th Villain Raimi and Arad were talking about? Most likely Spider-man, in his full symbiotic glory doing something evil. At comic-con that is what I believe will be revealed on a poster.
skix said:4th bad guy = spiderman symbiote
jimmy rhoads said:Four villans, no matter how cool it would be to see some comicbook badguys on screen for whatever amount of time, is just too much for a single movie. The movie-going auidence will eat up what Spider-Man 3 has to offer, but the fans of the comic will never be happy with crazy and twisted character development, and ten minutes of screen time -- more, to top it off, in what will probably be two hours.
fangrl06 said:Why is everyone so into BB? I thought it was one of the worst comic movies I've seen(not including the original FF, Captian America, and Supergirl).
You forgot "Since my girl. Since. YOU MUST USE IT!"cmill216 said:Taste my girl. Taste. YOU MUST FIND IT!
fangrl06 said:Why is everyone so into BB? I thought it was one of the worst comic movies I've seen(not including the original FF, Captian America, and Supergirl).
jusblaze21 said:I still favor Batman 89. But It's far from one of the worst comic books films made. It's a good film IMO.
jusblaze21 said:I still favor Batman 89. But It's far from one of the worst comic books films made. It's a good film IMO.
fangrl06 said:Why is everyone so into BB? I thought it was one of the worst comic movies I've seen(not including the original FF, Captian America, and Supergirl).
fangrl06 said:
hey, I listed some comic movies that were worse....
cmill216 said:Well underbudgeted comic films from the 80s or 90s and from non-major studios don't really count in my book. Films with actual Hollywood hotshots and big $ behind them that really suck? Those are the ones that deserve the flaming.
cmill216 said:Well underbudgeted comic films from the 80s or 90s and from non-major studios don't really count in my book. Films with actual Hollywood hotshots and big $ behind them that really suck? Those are the ones that deserve the flaming.