DaddlerTheDalek
Starship Captain
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 2,657
- Reaction score
- 277
- Points
- 73
Last edited:
It's called padding, my young padawan.Isn't Wonder Woman supposed to have a rack?
Bye!
Dude, I love magnets!
Please only comment in the future by posting pictures of your refrigerator. Thanks!
It's called padding, my young padawan.
Ever wonder what happened to Cameron Diaz's boobs after The Mask?
Isn't Wonder Woman supposed to have a rack?
Bye!
It's called padding, my young padawan.
Ever wonder what happened to Cameron Diaz's boobs after The Mask?
I just call it like I see it what can i say?
This was a business move pure and simple over one based on actual talent, I don't think that's even debatable? Gal brings with (or at least the producers hope so) some of that F&F money making shine.
I'm not saying she'll be terrible but I know what attracted them to her and it wasn't her acting.
You joke but it would kinda be nice if there were some breasts. Oh well.
Nevermind I just found a picture of her in a push up bra, were good!
Yes, because a sizable amount of that franchise's audience was coming there for Gal Gadot. Not for the action sequences, not for the higher-ranking actors... they were there for her. Doesn't matter that I'm sure almost none of them actually knew the actress by name. They were there for her, and Snyder has SURELY struck a goldmine by hooking that big fish.
They must've seen Marvel's strategy of casting Chris Hemsworth coming off of that MONSTROUS, award-worthy performance as Jim Kirk's dad. By the time Star Trek's credits started rolling, you better believe that they were searching for the name of that star in the making, and EVERYONE was walking out of that theater saying "Hey, forget the rest of that ****, that Chris Hemsworth owned it. He OWNED it!" And then Marvel was like "Well, ****, we better get on this!"
every thing dc/wb does is seemingly meet with this sort of gripping.
She still has a connection to that franchise and even if she's not a name (she isn't) she's still technically a face 10's of million have seen now and are at least vaguely familiar with.
It is almost a win-win for producers on that front. She's probably still willing to accept a bargain rate salary to be in the film but she's has that f&f cache, so when she's used in promotional materials like i said there will be many people who recognize her from those movies.
Also among the hardcore f&f fans she has a lot of supporters out there. A lot of people want her back for the sequel even though [BLACKOUT]her character apparently died in the last one.
[/BLACKOUT]
I heard Nolan cast her. She's legit.
As yes the old straw man.
Looking at my post I clearly said superman "hasn't been drawn anything other than well built"(obviously I'm talking about a functional superman and not some diseased elseworlds thing as seen in flashpoint for example). Who said two words about 'always Ripped'?
Secondly that's not all I said.
Lastly I said wonder woman is a woman of great beauty that has been molded from clay. And has magical powers gifted by the gods.
To answer your question Superman doesn't have that, no. To be specific, superman's powers have traditionally been something similar(no- proportional to his physique), but with one huge difference, his matabolism is sustained by solar energy and advanced efficiency. Dense muscles...etc...see birthright.
Wonder woman is a creature of magic. Next you will be suggesting Dr. Strange needs huge biceps before he lifts a car over his head. Very Different.
Double standard bs is all in your mind. Or rather your strawman.
I'm excited about it.Wonder Woman in a Superman vs. Batman movie... I sure hope this doesn't turn into a cluster****.
Wow, wonder if they'll adapt that first pic to the big screen?
I'm excited about it.