The thing is, they do. There are so many different looks for Cap, Thor, Hawkeye, etc. The thing is, a lot of them would take work, so they can't really do them quick, dirty and cheap. Which is what the higher ups want.They've been releasing all kinds of images of outfits for Spider-Man, all of which have been based on a comic look. Which is cool, but it's annoying that they're doing this for an add on character that's an exclusive, and the costume selection for the countless other base characters are mostly garbage repaints.
I know outside of Iron Man, a lot of them don't have hundreds of different costumes to draw from like Spider-Man, but I mean come on.
The dude on the screen? It could be Wonder Man.Is that Cyclops or Matt?
Same goes for some of those takedown animations, which are probably the only good things that came out of that video.Some of that swinging animation looks like they just ripped it directly from the Insomniac game.
I would love to live in an alternate universe where Insomniac got to make an Avengers game.
Eh, while they probably would do a better job than Square-Enix, I doubt they could really solve the core problem: the Avengers are a team whose members have *widely* varying powers and power scales. You just aren't going to be able to build a single engine that can handle and portray Cap, Iron Man, and Thor at the same time and equally well, not unless you abandon trying to be a "literal" action-adventure game entirely and go for something highly abstracted.
I'm sure Insomniac could make a great "Cap Simulator" or "Iron Man Simulator" in the style of their existing Spider-Man Simulator. They aren't going to be able to do them all at once.
Because Spidey sells. And probably when they said yes to this, they thought they'd have actual content for this game on a the regular. Not once every six months.
Why even include Spider-Man at all then?