You had no reason to split that post into multiple bits. That's the problem, you're not addressing the overall point of the post. You're nit-picking or "arguing", quite poorly I might add, individual parts of individual points, ever decreasing the size of an argument. It's an odd debating style and one I've never seen used in a real life debate, you usually argue the whole point somebody is trying to make. I fail to see how splitting up posts is useful except in the case where the points or discussion points are fundamentally different. There's only really two essential splits and the rest seem to be your attempt to simplify my arguments, as I don't make one argument per sentence, they bounce off each other as its part of forming a coherent response. Buuuut, it's not real life, its not verbal, I'm
happy to debate verbally if you want (Skype Chats are fun, I'd buy you a ticket to Australia but it's pretty hot here) , but if you want to stick to the way you do it, sure, your posts, your rules.
Soo, I'll just play the Joker game, whilst it makes things harder and is pretty much functionally pointless, sorta like dwarf tossing, we're here now, so yeah I suppose.
Annnnnyway, lets 'a' go.
Your agitated posts don't reflect that.
Well, you can read them how you want, perhaps you're projecting your inner narrative onto them, I wouldn't know, I'm not you. But I'm telling you as me that a forum doesn't agitate me. Bugs agitate me, wombats on occasion, rain does, when I accidentally mess up a sample, that agitates me.
But a name on the internet? Doesn't phase me, can tell you that with 100% certainty. Perhaps a slight emotional response, maybe. Not relevant.
Oh good, the next part of my post should be fine then!!
This really had nothing to do with the point I was making. It's not about what I like vs what you like.
Ahhhhhh. Wonderful.
This is where I start to get a bit confused, because just a second ago you said that "People get annoyed when a current actor for something is about to get axed, but then get in line and enjoy the new something" was a correct summation of your premise.
So my argument then flows into this point that you felt the need to split up, but regardless, we DO know you like Tobey.
We know, and don't be disingenuous because I have thousands of pro Raimi anti Webb posts to prove this, that you were upset at the idea of Tobey being replaced.
We know, that you have not gotten over it, and still hate Andrew Garfield.
So your own experience with a reboot series debunks the premise that you
confirm just above this post.
You were annoyed at Tobey being recasted for Andrew, but you have NOT gotten over it.
The existence of any pro Tobey person proves that people can be annoyed at recastings. Some let their voices be known in some sort of petition. I go on to say this in the next part of my post but you split it for some reason, so we'll move on.
Again this had nothing to do with the point I was making. Yes I loathe Garfield's Peter, just like his movies, but that has nothing to do with the fact that actors getting big petitions to be kept and not replaced doesn't mean anything. Go to the Bond or Superman fan communities and see where the likes of Brandon Routh and Pierce Brosnan rank now after all the thousands of protests and petitions.
Again, its incredibly relevant to the point you're making. The premise we're working from is one you confirmed to be your argument.
You split this post up and then said it wasn't relevant. But you didn't say why, you just ranted about Brosnan and Routh. You bring up a new point about big actors and the effect of petitions, but that is a strawman as that is NOT what I'm arguing. As you can see below (this all ties in but it's split), I treat petitions as an amount of people that say they will not accept the new over the old, in other words, people like you Joker.
Deja vu x infinity. Happens all the time. You think now all these protesting fans of Garfield aren't going anywhere. I'll pull an Andrew Lucas here and say WHERE'S YOUR PROOF?
I've got two valid examples (one so extreme it even reached the actor's ears) of fan protesting replacement, and now look at it. In Craig's case he's now the second most popular Bond behind Sean Connery. As for Brandon Routh, now it's more like Brandon who?
I can't say definitively with any 100% conclusive proof that Garfield will be diminished even more after a new better Spidey actor comes along (I say diminished, not meaning having not a fan left in the world because every iteration of a character has fans), but if history of this kind of thing is anything to go by, he will. It doesn't help him either that the movies he's in are garbage and not very popular.
I'm experiencing Dejavu again, a post has been needlessly unsplit.
Do I think
all Andrew Garfield protesters are going to dissapear?. unequivocally no. Where's my proof you may ask? Well, he's talking right to me. A fan that still hasn't gotten over a rebooted character. Are you saying TASM fans don't have your resolve. Do you think yourself above them? Cause I certainly don't, and I can see them fighting for Andrew for years to come.You can say "Tobey's good though, Andrew is bad." But this rebuttal won't hold as these people already prefer Andrew to Tobey.
In regards to the rest of your post that is really only tied to my split up post incidentally, your examples are cute, but not sure what you're attempting to achieve with them. Are you saying all reboot characters are superior to their former actors?
Because he disagrees
That is where your other two examples point, if you're trying to say fan petitions are worthless I'm saying they're a quantifiable measure of people who in the future may not accept a new spider-man.
But you're an even better example then a petition.
I'm not trying to change anything. I'm telling you straight with proof these petition fan protests have happened before. They don't mean anything. It's a tiny storm in an even tinier tea cup.
Just like all the people protesting Ben Affleck's casting as Batman. If he's good, these people won't care and will be all over him. The 97'000 signature petition will be as irrelevant as your 24'000 signature Andrew Garfield one will inevitably be.
Yes, thankyou for proving something has happened but you haven't even come close to disproving the essence of my arguement. This is what happens when you split posts mate. Now we're arguing if petitions are real. You already know what petitions mean in this context, I've told you 3 times now.
"Tiny storm in an even tinier teacup"
How on earth does that work? How does the storm occupy the space of the cup if the cup is smaller then the storm? Don't say the storm can occupy space outside the teacup because you explicitly said the storm was "in" the teacup. What you said sounded cool but it is actually impossible. What's that phrase you love, style over substance? Cause that's what that sentence felt like
Batfleck hasn't even happened but I can assure you there will be Joker's around regardless of his performance. Some will always say that Bale was better. Just like you say that Tobey is better than Andrew. That 97,000 meme will not be irrelevant, it will be a sign forever more of the first rise of Bale fans, through and through. Just like this petitition is "PROOOOF" of people who will love Garfield over any new spidey, and any old one. Just like you love Tobey over Andrew.
This is so silly that it doesn't even warrant a serious response.
Is it? Because to me you're just the same as people who sign those petitions, you're living proof that people will still be Garfield fanboys.
You are them, and they are you.
Petitions are a new quantifiable way to not only measure fan reaction to a new reboot but even
influence it.
Joker, I'm sorry, but you're existence disproves your premise.
Also, you missed bits I added to my other posts but I forgive you.
Main problem with this post was that by splitting it up you failed to rebut my dismissal of your main premise, and unfortunately added some pretty irrelevant stuff into your post.
Again, it's the nature of debate, we'd save more time if you ever wanted to speak in person. Anyone else smell podcast?
(Also I'm going to bed so I won't reply to your post for probably 10ish hours. Much love.