MagnarTheGreat
Web Ninja
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2011
- Messages
- 37,547
- Reaction score
- 21,149
- Points
- 103
So we're just supposed to to let criminals get away with their crime "because optics?" Because you don't like the way it "looks" for the DOJ to prosecute their old boss who WAS A CRIMINAL? As Sithborg pointed out, pardoning Nixon led to IranContra, no consequences for IranContra led to Bush's crimes and now we have Trump committing the most flagrant offenses yet. If there are no consequences for him, what exactly do you think is going to stop the next person in the White House who considers committing grevious crimes against the American people?
And there are few arguments I hate more than "What will his base do?" That's literally letting democracy and the justice system be held hostage by terrorists. If Trump faces prosecution and they want to play stupid games, well, that will be the end of their movement. Because that ain't a fight they're winning.
It seems like a lose-lose situation.
Look at the rise of Hitler. You can blame the fact that Germany felt screwed by the Treaty of Versailles or the fact that there was appeasement to avoid conflict that led to a powerful Nazi Germany.
So what do you do? Give 70 million Trump supporters a the rallying cry of victimhood or appeasement which will lead to more blatant attacks on our democratic institutions.
When is a mod going to change the name of this thread to "F'dup Chapters in American History (The Predator Years)"
It seems like a lose-lose situation.
Look at the rise of Hitler. You can blame the fact that Germany felt screwed by the Treaty of Versailles or the fact that there was appeasement to avoid conflict that led to a powerful Nazi Germany.
So what do you do? Give 70 million Trump supporters a the rallying cry of victimhood or appeasement which will lead to more blatant attacks on our democratic institutions?
Are we calling Biden "The Predator" now? He does however like to sniff on women & little kids so I guess that name would fit.
Latinos
2016: 66% H. Clinton - 28% Trump - 6% other/no answer (H. Clinton +38)
2020: 65% Biden - 32% Trump - 3% other/no answer (Biden +33)
Got less to do with Trump, and more that Biden did significantly worse with Latinos from early in the year against Sanders. Sanders may have done just as well or better among Latinos than Biden everywhere except Florida.
Bernie 100% would've done better with Latinos.Latinos
2016: 66% H. Clinton - 28% Trump - 6% other/no answer (H. Clinton +38)
2020: 65% Biden - 32% Trump - 3% other/no answer (Biden +33)
Got less to do with Trump, and more that Biden did significantly worse with Latinos from early in the year against Sanders. Sanders may have done just as well or better among Latinos than Biden everywhere except Florida.
Bernie 100% would've done better with Latinos.
That's the thing though: maybe you wouldn't need them if you were capturing other demographics.That would have been a badge of honor to carry with us during Trump's second term. But I'm not sure a Socialist would have performed better with the Dade County residents terrified of Socialism.
Trump fears Giuliani, other lawyers in Biden vote challenge are 'fools that are making him look bad'
I thought he hired the best people??
Trump fears Giuliani, other lawyers in Biden vote challenge are 'fools that are making him look bad'
I thought he hired the best people??
Trump fears Giuliani, other lawyers in Biden vote challenge are 'fools that are making him look bad'
I thought he hired the best people??
He doesn’t need anyone else to make him look bad.
Don't be naive.
It was the deep state that made him sweat hair dye and organize a conference in the middle of nowhere next to a porn shop.