Fist of Khonshu
Civilian
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2015
- Messages
- 783
- Reaction score
- 177
- Points
- 53
Oh, I know.
Alas and alack, keeping up with some of these threads is more than a full time job!
A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
Oh, I know.
Not just the female characters.It's becoming more and more clear to me that the strong female characters we all know and love were because of the source material, not the show's writers.
The more I think about it, and the more aware I become of the differences in the books, the thing that annoys be the absolute most about the final season is that they could have very easily just slipped Arianne Martell into the counsel scene. Sure, she'd never get justice as a character, but at the very least it wouldn't make a joke out of Ellaria's "Never again will weak men rule Dorne" line. Because now Dorne goes out being ruled by a male character so weak he literally has no name.
It's becoming more and more clear to me that the strong female characters we all know and love were because of the source material, not the show's writers.
It's becoming more and more clear to me that the strong female characters we all know and love were because of the source material, not the show's writers.
I also found it a bit frustrating that the show writers sure liked to focus a lot of the nudity and sex, and the exploitation of the women, as well as rape. For starters, in the first book, Dany wants Drogo, while in the show, they have him rape her. They also created the ****e, Ros, when she wasn't exactly in the books either. The show writers sure like to pander to the perverted male audience. I also wasn't too keen on how they portrayed the gay characters either.The more I think about it, and the more aware I become of the differences in the books, the thing that annoys be the absolute most about the final season is that they could have very easily just slipped Arianne Martell into the counsel scene. Sure, she'd never get justice as a character, but at the very least it wouldn't make a joke out of Ellaria's "Never again will weak men rule Dorne" line. Because now Dorne goes out being ruled by a male character so weak he literally has no name.
It's becoming more and more clear to me that the strong female characters we all know and love were because of the source material, not the show's writers.
Same. In fact, when it came to gay characters, that is all they focused on, the sex, and not other traits. Loras had struck a good friendship with Tommen, and the show never, ever bothered to focus on it.I've never enjoyed the way they portrayed gay male characters in the show too.
I also found it a bit frustrating that the show writers sure liked to focus a lot of the nudity and sex, and the exploitation of the women, as well as rape. For starters, in the first book, Dany wants Drogo, while in the show, they have him rape her. They also created the ****e, Ros, when she wasn't exactly in the books either. The show writers sure like to pander to the perverted male audience. I also wasn't too keen on how they portrayed the gay characters either.
Same. In fact, when it came to gay characters, that is all they focused on, the sex, and not other traits. Loras had struck a good friendship with Tommen, and the show never, ever bothered to focus on it.
Hey I liked Ros! she was a fun sexy character. Unpopular opinion I know, but I also found her death kinda fitting. The nudity and sex was also no worse than the ****ing violence. The fact that people have more issues with the former than the latter is crazy.I also found it a bit frustrating that the show writers sure liked to focus a lot of the nudity and sex, and the exploitation of the women, as well as rape. For starters, in the first book, Dany wants Drogo, while in the show, they have him rape her. They also created the ****e, Ros, when she wasn't exactly in the books either. The show writers sure like to pander to the perverted male audience. I also wasn't too keen on how they portrayed the gay characters either.
Probably because the nudity tends to be one sided, and it's real, while the violence is fake. I've also seen several interviews with Emelia Clarke, Maise Williams and Nathalie Emmanuel who admit the nude/sex scenes are weird for them when watching the show with their parents. Why aren't the men put in the same position as much as to the point where they feel weird when watching with their parents?Hey I liked Ros! she was a fun sexy character. Unpopular opinion I know, but I also found her death kinda fitting. The nudity and sex was also no worse than the ****ing violence. The fact that people have more issues with the former than the latter is crazy.
You mean like Will Tudor?Probably because the nudity tends to be one sided, and it's real, while the violence is fake. I've also seen several interviews with Emelia Clarke, Maise Williams and Nathalie Emmanuel who admit the nude/sex scenes are weird for them when watching the show with their parents. Why aren't the men put in the same position as much as to the point where they feel weird when watching with their parents?
Still weird that people would have no problem watching extreme violence with their parents, but draw the line with simulated sex and ****, but ok I guess. Look everyone has their "line", fine i get it. But it's still weird as **** to me, and always has been. Also they could up the Male nudity but I feel we would still be debating the issue.Probably because the nudity tends to be one sided, and it's real, while the violence is fake. I've also seen several interviews with Emelia Clarke, Maise Williams and Nathalie Emmanuel who admit the nude/sex scenes are weird for them when watching the show with their parents. Why aren't the men put in the same position as much as to the point where they feel weird when watching with their parents?
That is a perfect reaction.While the documentary isn't something you'd need to rush out to see, it had some fun moments. I wish we'd gotten more wrap scenes from actors beyond Emilia Clarke and Kit Harrington, though. The Location Manager swearing up a storm was probably the best part.
Next to Conleth Hill slowly putting his script away when he read Varys' fate.
We have seen multiple penises on this show and way too much of Jon's butt.Probably because the nudity tends to be one sided, and it's real, while the violence is fake. I've also seen several interviews with Emelia Clarke, Maise Williams and Nathalie Emmanuel who admit the nude/sex scenes are weird for them when watching the show with their parents. Why aren't the men put in the same position as much as to the point where they feel weird when watching with their parents?
Actually, I don't care for a lot of the violence too. And I hate the gratuitous violence on animals. Did we really need to see a horse's leg get chopped off in season 7? And I really don't care for the rape at all. No need for it. And the actual violence towards the kids as well. In the books, they were just mentioned, and not actually shown. It comes down to the fact that the show runners are some sick individuals.Still weird that people would have no problem watching extreme violence with their parents, but draw the line with simulated sex and ****, but ok I guess. Look everyone has their "line", fine i get it. But it's still weird as **** to me, and always has been. Also they could up the Male nudity but I feel we would still be debating the issue.
Actually, I don't care for a lot of the violence too. And I hate the gratuitous violence on animals. Did we really need to see a horse's leg get chopped off in season 7? And I really don't care for the rape at all. No need for it. And the actual violence towards the kids as well. In the books, they were just mentioned, and not actually shown. It comes down to the fact that the show runners are some sick individuals.
Dany has said some messed up things, done some messed up things; that I accept. But I always saw her words as bravado.
and the fact that she was always talked down was evidence in itself that she never really had it in her to do what she did in The Bells.
I keep coming back to the same scene that helps convince me that The Bells was a disgrace to her character; the fact that this woman locked up her children when she thought even just one innocent child was harmed.