GOSH DANG IT! I finally got a copy of JLA and was all 'OMG I can post in the thread!' And I find... this.
THIS IS WHAT I WANTED TO SEE! INSTEAD WE STILL GET THE SAME OL' TIRED PAIRINGS OF BATMAN AND SELENA KYLE, SUPERMAN WILL END UP WITH LOIS AGAIN.....CANARY AND GA....
Dinah/Bruce pairings are fun in Elseworld/Non-Canon stories because they're just that.
non-canon. It's that fun 'might have been'.
Honestly, as a female reader I take offense that characters
need to be paired up at all. Dinah and Babs went a long time each in various BoP runs without having 'men' in their lives. Ditto for Selena, Helena, Kate, etc..etc..
When Dinah was in the Green Arrow books back in the day she was nothing more than a prop. A well written prop, because at least Grell went into the fall out of things. But then she slipped back into being nothing and was only used to move forward GA storylines. Then they let her loose with bad writers and she sucked all on her own because everyone was like 'WTF do I do with her without GA around??'
When they decided to have the BC/GA marriage, it was nothing but a publicity stunt by DC and her characterization plummeted. Dinah
again became nothing more than a fun, sexy sidekick for GA.
Notice a pattern? What makes you think a BC/Batman match-up would be any different or in anyway good for both characters. At least with Catwoman she's always been presented as independent and has never, in my experience, been toed into the corner as being a sidekick as BC has been.
Someone once said, that before the marriage Dinah and Ollie were the best never married, divorced characters. I think the same. They both work as independents but with the added ties of 'children' in the mix.
All of that aside. They did a soft reboot of Dinah from my understanding. Most of her past still goes, except for her being a legacy character. So a Dinah/Bats pairing seems.. weird. They hardly interact, and you keep using the All-Star Batman & robin image which pretty much makes me wonder about your taste in comics
And Simone has said many times on her Tumblr that all the subtext between them is completely intentional on her part
Really? I'd like links, not because I'm being argumentative, but because I am a reference girl!
I actually remember this one from back in the day *and just went to find it*:
Gail Simone said:
Hmm.
First, welcome, Kate! Hooray! Glad you're here and please keep posting cool threads.
"Implied" is the wrong word. What I feel about Birds of Prey is that I wanted it to be interactive, I wanted each reader to get a slightly different experience because some things were deliberately meant to be filled in painlessly.
So, my intention was never to negate that. Clearly Dinah and Babs love each other like crazy. Whether they are crazy IN love, that's up to the reader, but I didn't want to negate it.
http://forums.comicbookresources.com/showpost.php?p=10169294&postcount=4
So, if you're straight, you're gonna see them as straight. If you're bi, you're gonna see them as bi. If you're gay... you get the picture. But I don't think comic characters have to at some point 'state' their sexuality. Actions speak louder than words. Dinah's been married twice (granted one was right out of HS and the other a stupid choice) and involved with a plethora of men. Nothing in that track record shows me she's gay, perhaps bi, but again... never seen an interest in other women in her. Except for of course those panels everyone throws up for 'proof'.
Now for my opinion: As a long time BC fan, I'd be royally pissed with DC if they retconned a gay interaction with her in, or had her hook up with Babs. It would
look like a cheap and shoehorned way to add 'diversity' to their line-up, instant shock value (just like that terrible wedding). They create new characters all the time. They can create gay ones, or make gay's out of older, barely used characters (I totally think Hazard would be gay btw if they ever used her as more than background).
I literally have a Babs/Dinah friendship with my best friend, it's obvious to both of us the subtext that people can see with us but I am in no way interested in her romantically, and vice versa (I think she is bi though....so who knows?). So it is extremely insulting that people automatically think that such a close friendship is because of sexual tension.
So, no, no one is going to force you into an opinion Mysti. But you mention Babs/Dinah an awful lot.
It really was!
Trusty, I take back everything I ever said about him.. he's totally 'do-able' too. Pity he's got Mera
Dinah and Wonder Woman. Huh? HUH?
There was so much tension between the two in those training panels.
.. Now I need to re-think my JLA post!