• We experienced a brief downtime due to a Xenforo server configuration update. This was an attempt to limit bot traffic. They have rolled back and the site is now operating normally. Apologies for the inconvinience.

Disney in talks to buy Fox: X-Men Homecoming? - Part 4

There's no way they don't give Storm her due after all this talk. At least having one of the leaders of the X-Men be a black woman would be a big step forward. I hope she gets big enough that she gets solos too.
 
Jeffrey Wright is too old for Hank/Beast. He's already 52 years old and he'll be pushing 60 by the time the first MCU X-Men comes out. Age is a huge factor in casting. I do have a few other picks in mind for Hank that are poc

It wouldn't matter once the transformation occurs. Then he'd either be in Makeup/Prosthetics or doing Motion Capture like Ruffalo. Like Grammer he brings an intellect and gravitas to the role that would be harder to find in a younger, less seasoned actor.
 
That was never my point. You all are basically saying since nobody knows anyone besides the X-MEN from the Jim Lee era that it's better to raceswap instead of introducing new characters to the public.

Okay, let's work with that then. When your rebuttal was about the age of the sample I took so I had to bring up a new sample to show you it was even more homogenous now.

"We all" are not just talking about knowledge, a movie can introduce new characters, easy peasy, but those who agree with me are talking about three main things:

1) Desired X-Men vs Possible X-Men

People want to see the Jim Lee era X-Men, they have invested in them over the years, and look forward to seeing them done right, but there are only so much screen time available, not enough to cover everyone well. So you have this demand outstripping supply, to add to that giving one of the slots to an "unworthy" character that isn't highly anticipated, well... it's like if Marvel slipped Avengers 4 off the docket and replaced it with Strike Force Morituri. Cool characters, not cool enough.

2) Storylines vs Replacements

Dark Phoenix requires Jean. Replacing her in it makes for a lesser storyline. Similar could be said for many storylines that spotlight the Jim Lee era X-Men. We see what happens when other characters are subbed into classic storylines they weren't apart of on the Arrowverse all the time, and not only does the story not work as well with different characters, but one can easily be reminded how much better the story was in the comics with the characters written for that story.

3) Best characters, most diverse characters, why not both?

As a result of storyline focus, Scott Summers is just a *better* character than Velocidad. Not that Velocidad's bad, but Cyclops has received so much more development, to put Velocidad in Scott's place makes for a worse movie, a worse storyline. It's the old anti-Affirmative Action propaganda: Would you want a worse policeman protecting you because they're a minority? And while that doesn't have any real substance in real life, in the fictional world, it's kinda true. So if you're stuck to "keep things as they are" and "Oh, X-Men are so diverse" you have to choose between a world classly developed 60s demographic, or an fresh untested modern demographic.

But you don't have to choose. You can just do Hispanic Cyclops. You can have a world class character with a modern demographic. Keep all the development and pathos he's gotten since the 60s, keep all the storylines intact to adapt as you please, and you lose only a few purists from the hype machine anticipating his arrival. It's the win-win.

That's my case.
 
But you don't have to choose. You can just do Hispanic Cyclops. You can have a world class character with a modern demographic. Keep all the development and pathos he's gotten since the 60s, keep all the storylines intact to adapt as you please, and you lose only a few purists from the hype machine anticipating his arrival. It's the win-win.

That's my case.


As with your suggestions for Latino Beast & Lightskin Storm I'll just agree to disagree.
 
As with your suggestions for Latino Beast & Lightskin Storm I'll just agree to disagree.

You disagree with the thing you quoted? Which means you feel you have to choose?

Also... when did I suggest lightskinned Storm? Not that I have a problem with that, but that's not my preference.

Valkryie, Okoye, Nakia, Shuri people left the last two MCU movie praising these characters.

True. Valkyrie is evidence that race-swapping an established A-lister (in terms of the Thor franchise) is a good movie all around. Okoye, Nakia and Shuri are not examples of taking deep cuts from diversity and replacing A-listers (again, in terms of the BP franchise). Okoye, Nakia and Shuri have been at the top of everyone's "want to see in BP" list since they existed. A deep cut for diversity would have been making, say, Cannibal in his female form one of the main Dora Milaje and leaving Okoye out, since BP is "so diverse."

Someone like Monet is stronger just as smart and has way better powerset. She'd be a excellent tank instead of a Colossus or rogue for example. X-MEN didn't stop with the animated series
Hmmm... not bad. Monet being more potent doesn't necessarily make her better for a storyteller, even if she makes it better for someone on her team, and that stilld oesn't address the problems I outlined 1-2-3.

Kitty Pryde is Jewish and a minority.

Also, you could always change it to X-23/Laura is the new Wolverine of the films. Just saying.

I'm not saying Kitty's not Jewish, but she's definitely White, with all the assumptions and privileges that go with. Certainly she has a distinctive culture, and that is not the majority culture, but she's no more a minority than a Roma-American or an Italian-American.

And if anything or anyone replaces Wolverine people will have kittens. I'm not even sure that the MCU can get away with not putting him in the first film.
 
You disagree with the thing you quoted? Which means you feel you have to choose?

Also... when did I suggest lightskinned Storm? Not that I have a problem with that, but that's not my preference.



True. Valkyrie is evidence that race-swapping an established A-lister (in terms of the Thor franchise) is a good movie all around. Okoye, Nakia and Shuri are not examples of taking deep cuts from diversity and replacing A-listers (again, in terms of the BP franchise). Okoye, Nakia and Shuri have been at the top of everyone's "want to see in BP" list since they existed. A deep cut for diversity would have been making, say, Cannibal in his female form one of the main Dora Milaje and leaving Okoye out, since BP is "so diverse.".


I disagree with a non white Cyclops. I'll never even consider it in my mind until god forbid it actually happens.

Months ago I was saying how I hope they only cast a dark skin Ororo and you went off on multiple post on how it was basically racist for me to suggest that and consider Alexandra Shipp feelings blah blah blah (may have been someone else a FOXMEN fan in this thread maybe but it was in this thread while back)


A large % of the GA didn't know black panther before his movie they didn't know any of his supporting cast. Shuri, Okoye, Nakia were definitely deep cuts alot of ppl still can't pronounce their names correctly. Obviously comic fans wanted them in the movie but marvel changed alot about them to fit the MCU. My thing is take frenzy, oya, Sunfire, Warpath etc and do the same thing.
 
Bear with me for a moment... I don't think this is actually true.

lKOnoHH.jpg


Of the X-Men, not counting characters, like, say Angel Salvadore who have been X-Men in comics but are considered "taking someone's spot" when they're included on a team, we have

White Males: Havok, Iceman, Beast, Scott, Xavier, Wolverine, Banshee, Colossus, Nightcrawler, Sabertooth, Gambit, Longshot, Angel, Cable, Magneto
White Females: Polaris, Dazzler, Jean Grey, Rogue, Psylocke technically, Marrow
Black Males: Bishop
Black Females: Storm, Cecelia Reyes
Hispanic Males: ...
Hispanic Females: Cecelia Reyes
Asian Males: Sunfire
Asian Females: Psylocke-ish
Other Males: Forge (First Nations)
Other Females: ...

.

You clearly forgot Kwannon, Armor, Neal Shaara, M, Dust, Jubilee, Frenzy, Warpath, Thunderbird, Trinary, Surge, Wind Dancer, Indra, Gentle, Tag, Prodigy, Mirage, Sunspot to name a few.
 
There are lots of diverse X-men but they don't even get treated well in the comics, let alone movies or cartoons.

If a non-white character who's name isn't Storm gets more focus before Cyclops, Jean, Wolverine, Iceman, Colossus, Gambit, Rogue, Kitty (and others), fans will be just as pissed as they would if one of those characters was race-swapped.
 
Just don't swap anybody whose race plays a part in who they are + Jean and Scott. Problem solved. I understand the importance of diversity but some things shouldn't he messed with
 
There are lots of diverse X-men but they don't even get treated well in the comics, let alone movies or cartoons.

If a non-white character who's name isn't Storm gets more focus before Cyclops, Jean, Wolverine, Iceman, Colossus, Gambit, Rogue, Kitty (and others), fans will be just as pissed as they would if one of those characters was race-swapped.


That's why you balance the roster. A 6 man team of Cyclops, Marvel Girl, Wolverine, + Storm & 2 More POC (Or Northstar instead of a 3rd POC) would work imo



The FOX movies don't care about non white characters. The cartoons aren't being made anymore and the comics will fall in line if the movie sets the precedent.


If a poc gets love in a MCU movie everything else will work itself out.
 
Just don't swap anybody whose race plays a part in who they are + Jean and Scott.
I agree about Jean because the red hair is a must (I mean, she's the Phoenix), but why does Scott need to be white? Why can't he be Asian, for example. I mean it's not like it would matter that much, his eyes are always covered anyway. :o
 
Just having Storm, Bishop, Jubilee, Forge and Psylocke in the team is enough for showing diversity.
 
As far as raceswapping in X-MEN I wouldn't have a problem with it for supervillains like a Spiral or Sauron type
 
Mr. Sinister can be a poc too but he also has chalk white skin like Domino did so that might cause some controversy
 
If you think it would cause controversy then why hire a poc for the role that features the character in an unusual skin color like gray.
 
Let me be the first to endorse the idea of Jeffrey Wright as Hank. Kelsey Beast was by far the best thing about TLS and Mr. Wright should be able to bring a similar bearing to the character.

Wright is getting too old for the part, unfortuantely, but race-swapping Beast has definitely been on my mind. I'd choose Leslie Odom Jr.

Leslie-Odom-Jr-tmb.jpg


Professor X himself is another I think is prime for a change, namely because Denzel Washington as Charles would be utter perfection. As for already diverse characters, Storm and Forge are two obvious ones, plus Iceman, whose prime for the MCU's first openly gay hero. One I DON"T think should be changed if they use him, is Angel. Him being the ultimate "W.A.S.P." is kind of key to his character.

And there are a lot of younger X-Men getting overlooked, here. I think that we'll definitely going to see a focus on the students this time, given current pop culture trends. So a few options there:

XMEN_Oya.jpg
1438956165.png
latest


Oya has a very cool power set and provides a unique and complex character to the mix as a mutant who has believed the lies the world has thrown at her and is afraid of what she truly is. Armor is extremely impressive visually, serves as a potential leader for the new generation, and her relationship with Wolverine is fun, and a side of Logan we really haven't gotten to see. Gentle brings in Wakandan connections and is a really fun character, personality wise.
 
I'm not saying Kitty's not Jewish, but she's definitely White, with all the assumptions and privileges that go with. Certainly she has a distinctive culture, and that is not the majority culture, but she's no more a minority than a Roma-American or an Italian-American.

Reductive.

And if anything or anyone replaces Wolverine people will have kittens. I'm not even sure that the MCU can get away with not putting him in the first film.

Shouldn't they have kittens? If we are talking about gender and racial inclusion, isn't it time to change things regardless of hurt feelings?
 
Don't change anyone for the sake of changing. Forced diversity is the worst diversity.
 
OK, but...Laura/X-23 as Wolverine is already a thing in the comics...
 
Don't change anyone for the sake of changing. Forced diversity is the worst diversity.
Better than forced whiteness. Besides, the original 5 are boring af.

Thought this was interesting:

tumblr_p59i2sAvP21ulrvdio1_1280.png


The idea that genre films can't be political needs to die in a fire. I look forward to them politicizing the hell out of the X-Men.
 
I agree about Jean because the red hair is a must (I mean, she's the Phoenix), but why does Scott need to be white? Why can't he be Asian, for example. I mean it's not like it would matter that much, his eyes are always covered anyway. :o
I agree. Cyclops is definitely one of the characters whose race could easily be changed.

And overall I agree with those who prefer changing the ethnisity of some of the iconic characters over replacing them with c-listers.
 
I disagree with a non white Cyclops. I'll never even consider it in my mind until god forbid it actually happens.

Months ago I was saying how I hope they only cast a dark skin Ororo and you went off on multiple post on how it was basically racist for me to suggest that and consider Alexandra Shipp feelings blah blah blah (may have been someone else a FOXMEN fan in this thread maybe but it was in this thread while back)


A large % of the GA didn't know black panther before his movie they didn't know any of his supporting cast. Shuri, Okoye, Nakia were definitely deep cuts alot of ppl still can't pronounce their names correctly. Obviously comic fans wanted them in the movie but marvel changed alot about them to fit the MCU. My thing is take frenzy, oya, Sunfire, Warpath etc and do the same thing.

I know you disagree with my conclusion, but I'm asking a question and you say "I disagree." Similarly, months ago I pointed out how dragging Shipp for being lightskinned was f'ed up, nothing about you being racist, nor about your desire for a dark skinned storm, much less me wanting a lightskinned Storm. And now, I'm examining diversity and you're imagining I said there was no diversity. I'm starting to think you don't read my posts so much as think about how you feel and then imagine that I said things that would justify those feelings.

As I've said before, the issue is not how known the characters are, but taking the "place" of more demanded characters, and how that affects the hype machine, as well as short circuiting stories built for other characters and how that affects the overall story. This is why you can't do the same thing with Frenzy, because Frenzy is "taking a spot" and Nakia is not. Frenzy is subverting certain X-Men stories that are built for other characters, and Nakia is not, so the same thing simply can't be done.

You clearly forgot Kwannon, Armor, Neal Shaara, M, Dust, Jubilee, Frenzy, Warpath, Thunderbird, Trinary, Surge, Wind Dancer, Indra, Gentle, Tag, Prodigy, Mirage, Sunspot to name a few.

Forget? No, I specifically mentioned, as you quoted, X-Men like Angel Salvadore, X-Men who are less developed, less important to the mythos, less demanded and ultimately who will be seen as "taking" a spot from a more "deserving" character. Expanding on what I said in later posts, while Dust is undoubtedly a member of the X-Men, the same reason Dust has never been on the main team in comics is the same reason why she won't be on the main team in films. She is supporting cast diversity, no different than what you see in Avengers.

There are similarly many diverse members of the extended roster of 100 Avengers: Rage and Echo, Amadeus Cho and Storm, Monica Rambeau, White Tiger, Power Man that's not Luke Cage, Blade, Blue Marvel, Nova, Pod, Synapse, Singularity and Sister Grimm. But we don't say the Avengers are "so diverse." Because we don't attribute the diversity of supporting teams and short-term members to the Avengers, we only look at the main Avengers team to determine how diverse the Avengers are. If you apply the same logic to the X-Men, they're not any more diverse, are they?

Reductive.

Race is a reductive concept. That's the problem.

Shouldn't they have kittens? If we are talking about gender and racial inclusion, isn't it time to change things regardless of hurt feelings?

No. Especially in entertainment, the idea of doing things regardless of hurt feelings is unprofitable, and moreover, unnecessary. You can change things as needed and still have an understanding, even empathy of people's hurt feelings and manage those. In this case, if the goal is to have more female representation, that is a kind of diversity that X-Men far outstrips any other superhero franchise at, so instead of replacing THE favorite X-Man Wolverine, it would accomplish your goal and also care for the most feelings to have a main team that is: Storm, Jean, Rogue, Psylocke, Wolverine and Jubilee. This is more marketable, implies more goodwill from the longstanding comics and so on and so forth.

Likewise, with raceshifting, there will definitely be ruffled feathers if Beast is an Indian guy, no doubt. There will be *more* ruffled feathers however if Beast is replaced by Neal Shaara ("WHO!?") and not just from racists, but people who care about the stories of the X-Men and Beast's position as the lovable furball uncle in them.

Just cuz you need to flip over the monopoly board doesn't mean you need to slap everyone at the table too.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"