heatvision38
Man of Steel
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2017
- Messages
- 5,273
- Reaction score
- 3,823
- Points
- 103
How is Clark eating in that moment such a different transition?. He's just eating food lol. Rouths Superman had no personality other than the sad face emoticon and his Clark while definitely a little goofy just isn't enough to distract the fact he's Superman. As I said with Reeve it was more than acting goofy. He walked different, he slouched, he hunched his shoulders, he changed his voice. Rouths voice was just as nasally as Superman as he was as Clark. I'm not saying the actor has to play Clark as tripping over stuff all the time but they have to carry themselves differently in a big way. When Clark was in Lois apartment, took off his Glasses and stood up right, you saw the absolute genius of not just Clarks disguise but Reeve as an actor. He gains what looks like 4 inches, his shoulders go back, his voice becomes deep and Imposing and he commands the screen. Even though you know he's the same person, you believe in that moment that he isn't. No one else has done that for me. They all play Clark to much the same as Superman.
I couldn't find that clip so I can't demonstrate the difference visually. It's just the way Superman acts, the way his hair is, his blue eyes pop more, he is more measured in what he says, he stands up straight, etc. Then when Lois comes down the elevator and see Clark eating with Jimmy, Richard, and Jason, Clark just has a more manic, curious expression, the glasses on, the hair covering his face, his mouth movement, with the napkin in his shirt. Every time I watch that scene, I can see how people wouldn't mistake them for the same person.
And yes, he does have some silly or goofy qualities, but it's much more toned down compared to Reeve's Clark. I remember an interview Routh did back before the movie came out and he talked about how he wanted to make sure Clark didn't stand out too much, that people wouldn't notice him, but at the same time, he still will have a certain amount of fish-out-of-water exuberance, being a small ville guy in a big city and in a very packed news bullpen. So he would still have moments of bumping into someone, stuff like that, but it wouldn't be cartoonish live Reeve's Clark was. And that's how it came across to me.
Melissa Benoist does a similar take with her Kara and Supergirl on her show. Public Kara feels like a real person and yet still very different than Supergirl, who also feels like a real person. Different aspects of their personalities being highlighted.
I've always been of the belief that it's not just one person who then wears two masks (public Clark and Superman), with private Clark/Kal-El being the real person, but rather, a continuum. Public Clark (if done well), private Clark/Kal-El (the guy his parents, Lois, Jon, Bruce, Diana, J'onn, etc, know), and Superman are all just different aspects of the same person with different qualities dialed up. I imagine Clark feels most natural when he is private Clark as that is how he grew up, but those other facets of who he is are also real, not just masks.
We can be one way at work, another way with our partner, a goofball when with our friends, obnoxious when playing sports or being competitive. Which is the real us? They all are. I remember some years back when I was a high school guidance counselor and I was pretty professional at work because I had to be a role model (I still had a sense of humor, but it was much more muted). Then when I was with my friends on the weekends, sometimes when I'd get really get carried away with joking around, they'd jokingly ask me how they ever let me work with kids. Both sides were a part of me-- the professional, responsible side and the laid back goofball who doesn't shut up.
Btw, I think the same for Batman given I always hear people say Batman is his true face and Bruce is the mask. Nah ah. Both are parts of who is. Here is a definition on personality: http://www.apa.org/topics/personality/
The key part of that is that one's personality comprises the whole range of attributes contained within an individual. This is why they changed the diagnostic term from Multiple Personality Disorder to Dissociative Identity Disorder 25 years ago because the APA recognized that MPD was actually a misnomer, it was inaccurate. All the identities were parts of the one personality.Personality refers to individual differences in characteristic patterns of thinking, feeling and behaving. The study of personality focuses on two broad areas: One is understanding individual differences in particular personality characteristics, such as sociability or irritability. The other is understanding how the various parts of a person come together as a whole.
Anyway, I sort of went on a stream of consciousness with respect to identity. Sorry for being long-winded, but I find this stuff fascinating. t: