I'm not seeing the article or any source say that.
Not saying it's 100% not true but yeah I don't see anything on Deadline or anywhere corroborating that yet
I hate those things hahaomg a troll account.. The tweet was from @discuusingfilm... with the same design like the original page. Sorry.
I actually watched this one twice and felt like it flowed better the second time. It was a pretty complex movie and my first viewing felt like there were a lot of bumpy spots and flow problemsI might do a rewatch of this movie soon. I have been thinking about it lately and feel like enough time has passed since I last watched it that I can go in with fresh eyes. Maybe I will feel about it differently.
I actually watched this one twice and felt like it flowed better the second time. It was a pretty complex movie and my first viewing felt like there were a lot of bumpy spots and flow problems
Because thats what happens when you actually shoot on location and not on a soundstage like the rest of the MCU movies.
Maybe Oswalt was too busy promoting Sandman that he assumed Eternals 2 was one of the many projects announced at SDCC lol.Marvel never confirmed that? I hope Oswalt is correct. I want a sequel. I liked Eternals
They definitely wanted to use Harry Styles and they will get a lot of his fans on board at least. Separately I have a feeling the second film if it happens will be much better without having to do all that historical setup.
I also liked the history - was more thinking of how other people would view it given many didn’t like the film or were mixed on it. The only issue I had with all of that was the pacing seemed off (and I’m not normally someone who is that bothered about pacing) as a result of jumping about. Yes exactly, it took a long time to get to the here and now full on. I’d love it if Chloe Zhao can come back and deliver a winner that is well received across the board as there were many good ingredients here and I also liked a lot of the cast.I actually liked the historical setup. It made everything seem so big and epic. What I wasn’t a fan of was how long it took them to regroup in the present day. I remember looking at my watch a couple of times. The movie dragged quite a bit. Hopefully the sequel is tighter. Keep the same grand, epic feel but definitely tighten the script
I know they are saying it was Kirby's creation, but the eternals we got was not Kirby's it was Gaiman's version. Kirby's Eternals are from Earth and were created by the Celestials experimenting on the primates. It sort of creates our missing link of how man evolved from primate to human. The Celestials are the missing link. Also we got more Kirby design from Thor ragnarok and Guardians of the Galaxy than we did from The Eternals movie. Just look at the plain ship they flew compared to what Kirby drew for the celestial host ship. Also look at the Celestials themselves in the movie compared to what we have already seen in GOTG. This version of the eternals was not Kirby by design or by story. I still think the Kirby version is the way to do the Eternals.Meanwhile, an Eternals sequel has been a less likely prospect ever since the original movie hit theaters last year. Jack Kirby’s immortal superheroes managed to rake in over $400 million worldwide, so it wasn’t exactly a box office bomb. But it is one of the MCU’s lowest-grossing efforts. And while not without its defenders, Eternals also received some of the most middling reviews in the history of the franchise. Regardless, the film’s two cliffhanger endings – one of which introduced Oswalt’s Pip the Troll alongside Harry Styles as Eros/Starfox – implied that we haven’t seen the last of its characters. In fact, Oswalt appeared to confirm as much during a recent appearance on NBC’s Today.